Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org), page 6

  1. britt (britt@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Sunday, 02-Sep-2018 13:08:10 EDT britt britt

    Surfing is an exercise in dealing with FOMO.

    In conversation Sunday, 02-Sep-2018 13:08:10 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink Repeated by rustyswarf
  2. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Thursday, 20-Sep-2018 21:55:27 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    • SaamDaamDandBhed

    @saamdaamdandbhed Personal growth requires alternation between the two.

    I'd almost say most useful action is done in autopilot. When people are doing difficult, critical things, you don't want them to be pushing their limits.

    In conversation Thursday, 20-Sep-2018 21:55:27 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  3. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Sep-2018 19:20:14 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    • kureshii

    @kureshii oops, I think "terminal" was the word I was looking for.

    In conversation Tuesday, 18-Sep-2018 19:20:14 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  4. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Sep-2018 00:56:44 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    • P.H. Higgins

    @Pen_and_Screen Dude, you really need to read The Elements Of Style.

    In conversation Tuesday, 18-Sep-2018 00:56:44 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  5. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Sep-2018 00:20:49 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    • Michael Chapiro

    @mchapiro Sounds like your question is beyond anything I know about innovation theory. What does "statistical mechanics of technology" mean?

    In conversation Tuesday, 18-Sep-2018 00:20:49 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  6. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Monday, 17-Sep-2018 23:54:45 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    • Michael Chapiro

    @mchapiro There's plenty of business literature on this. Specific technologies advance when one company makes a profitable breakthrough and then others compete to catch up.

    The breakthroughs happen when when previously-unrelated technologies are combined in a newly useful way.

    In conversation Monday, 17-Sep-2018 23:54:45 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  7. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Monday, 17-Sep-2018 23:44:43 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    • Michael Chapiro

    @mchapiro What kind of tech do you aspire to advance?

    In conversation Monday, 17-Sep-2018 23:44:43 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  8. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Monday, 17-Sep-2018 23:03:31 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf

    A big part of expertise is being aware of the full range of "Things we might as well try because they won't do catastrophic damage."

    The boldness of experts appears shocking from the outside.

    Thread of examples?

    In conversation Monday, 17-Sep-2018 23:03:31 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  9. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Monday, 17-Sep-2018 22:56:35 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf

    Simple mechanical example: adjusting idle screws on a carbureted engine. If you know what they are, then it's a simple change that is easily un-doable.

    But if you open a car's hood without understanding which screw does what, you'll notice maybe a hundred screws that each might do anything. Screwing or unscrewing any particular one could mess up your whole engine block.

    This is the fear I feel about using the Kernel.

    In conversation Monday, 17-Sep-2018 22:56:35 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  10. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 01:59:45 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    in reply to
    • Strange Attractor

    @strangeattractor There's no way of knowing, as with any complex system. You follow best practices and avoid the mistakes you've seen already.

    You're paying for the judgement of plumber who has seen a lot of failures.

    In conversation Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 01:59:45 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  11. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 01:09:02 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    • Strange Attractor

    @strangeattractor If you have a bad vibe from a saleperson, I'd trust that.

    Sorry if I got a bit worked up, I'm just sayin ...

    People who practice their trades day in and day out usually design things well even when they can't explain exactly why or how.

    In conversation Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 01:09:02 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  12. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 01:00:15 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    in reply to
    • Strange Attractor

    @strangeattractor

    WTF kind of PHD chemist do you expect to be doing plumbing for you? Nobody even knows for certain how long PEX lasts, but it's modern industry standard. You want copper ion sensors in your faucet hooked up to to online telemetry? Get a grip, man!

    In conversation Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 01:00:15 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  13. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 00:52:28 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    in reply to
    • Strange Attractor

    @strangeattractor Heh, I have no skin in the game, so here goes.

    First, this is probably a miscommunication issue. A quote is not a document that shows reasoning behind design decisions.

    Second, it is entirely normal and appropriate for contractors to mark up raw materials by those rates.

    In conversation Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 00:52:28 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  14. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 00:40:39 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    in reply to
    • Strange Attractor

    @strangeattractor So you're asking him to guarantee the old pipes in your walls that he didn't install?

    In conversation Saturday, 15-Sep-2018 00:40:39 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  15. Rusty Swarf (rustyswarf@refactorcamp.org)'s status on Friday, 14-Sep-2018 20:42:56 EDT Rusty Swarf Rusty Swarf
    • Strange Attractor

    @strangeattractor Types of possibly legitimate bullshit answers:

    1. Brief but vague: "We'll get it done right."

    2. Half true: "We'll do it this way, which is good because_____." (Don't offer the client a decision he isn't qualified to make.)

    3. Canned universal diagnosis: "Well what you've got here is a ____ problem. We can fix that the same way we do every time."

    Over-explaining options to clients can cause a lot of worry and nitpicking that may hurt the finished product.

    In conversation Friday, 14-Sep-2018 20:42:56 EDT from refactorcamp.org permalink
  • After
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.