Yeah, money helps and Google's engineers could start their browser with lessons learned, but I think they did it well - less screen real-estate to menubars from the start, address bar and search bar in one, sandboxing, each tab its own process etc, etc. - it worked better, faster and sucked us all in with their centralized services - search, spamfree Gmail, Docs, YouTube...
Right, internet explorer is so abysmal that I can believe significant numbers of people deliberately sought a better browser. However, their reason for choosing Chrome might have been driven by the dominance of using Google search, where the Chrome browser is constantly advertised for easy download. You have to know about Firefox to find and download it. Since the Chrome browser is fast, as it should be since it is produced by a very wealthy company with a vested interest in mining the data of its users, people like it for performance reasons. I'm a big Firefox supporter but to me it's very much like Hubzilla or any of these privacy respecting open source apps: without corporate support and advertising of the software, it will remain the underdog and possibly become completely irrelevant depending on how hard the corporations want to push it.
Firefox addons are great, IE addons sucked too, Chrome supports web standards like HTML5, CSS3, WebGL, WebRTC a lot faster than Firefox. Edge 16 scores higher than Firefox!
Opinion: people switched to Google Chrome because IE sucked at the time - it did not even work with Sharepoint, Firefox is chosen because it works nearly as well as Chrome, because of extensions, web development and a bit more privacy?
They're really giving far too much credit here to the public when it comes to "choosing a browser". I bet the number of people that make a conscious choice about their browser are statistically insignificant.
That's a question. If you are born in California, let's say, and move to Australia, as an example, your birthday date on documents is timezone-adjusted or you will get older by a day?
What does it take to cause a switch? Decentralization of day-to-day services. The browser is dead at the hand of services, long live the decentralized service browser. If Mozilla built a browser with decentralized search ala Yacy as a core feature I would switch, because I would feel empowered about wresting the search results presented to me from payed rankings with added privacy. If the browser came with a service for nomadic decentralized publishing ala Hubzilla, I would switch.
The Librem are the first high-end laptops where you are in control and have complete visibility into the operating system, all bundled software, and the deeper levels of your computer. Typical laptops use hardware chips coupled with software that can betray you (including tracking you without your consent). News stories have shown how these chips c...
I used lolcommits once. Then I looked through the photos and they were kinda boring and basically all the same. Fun idea but your real face when you commit doesn't match the fun stuff people post.
Inside Mozilla, CEO Chris Beard and his team are preparing to outmaneuver Google’s Chrome browser. The battle begins in November, with their release of Firefox 57.
Hubzilla normally links tags at the source. Diaspora links them at the destination; which totally messes up tags that were linked at the source and leads to disparities in tag content which tends to favour large sites over smaller sites. I forgot about this issue during the re-write when implementing the V2 federation protocol and the new markdown library. Will sort it out tomorrow.