Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org), page 134

  1. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 18:49:57 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    > https://loadaverage.org/attachment/6140549
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 18:49:57 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  2. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 18:46:46 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    > https://loadaverage.org/attachment/6140545
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 18:46:46 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  3. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 18:45:55 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    @coolboymew
    #NSFW https://loadaverage.org/attachment/6140543
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 18:45:55 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  4. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 18:03:47 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    • Federated Republic of Sean
    The NPK only measurement is a not a healthy way to grow crops, it is actually an error that Von Liebig tried to correct after understanding that chemical fertilization is a mistake.

    I recommend reading with "Teaming with microbes" by Jeff Lowenfels, he also made two other books after this one, Teaming with nutrients and Teaming with fungi, he recommends to read them in order, and I too:
    https://loadaverage.org/url/6140478
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 18:03:47 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  5. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:55:23 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    Flute done.
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:55:23 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  6. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:38:53 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    Time for some flute.
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:38:53 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  7. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:36:47 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    Sending a gift at your home tomorrow :3
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:36:47 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  8. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:30:06 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    >Maybe he gay
    No I am not.
    I'm someone who can't read body language and can't sense when he makes people uncomfortable yes.
    More than once I realized a day or two after that someone was actually proposing me something.
    I am so bad at this that in a month I'm gonna be officially a wizard.

    Plus my actually life/work doesn't help either.
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:30:06 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  9. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:21:38 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    No #walk with my dog tonight, too much rain and I don't want his arthritis to hurt more.
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:21:38 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  10. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:13:21 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    >Is that what you say to plus-sized women too?
    I don't meet any woman so no.
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:13:21 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  11. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:09:25 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    >but that's means more ass to crush me
    My sentence for suc cases is "The more there is the more to love".
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 17:09:25 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  12. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:49:27 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    https://themarkup.org/blacklight is not 100% accurate I tried it with "nouvelobs.com" which is a website that contains ludicrous amount of crap if you let JS work and "....blacklight" din't notice much. https://loadaverage.org/attachment/6140338
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:49:27 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  13. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:46:08 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    Pic related. https://loadaverage.org/attachment/6140325
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:46:08 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  14. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:43:21 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    https://themarkup.org/blacklight
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:43:21 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink

    Attachments

    1. Invalid filename.
      Blacklight – The Markup
      A Real-Time Website Privacy Inspector
  15. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:38:07 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    • Your New SJW Waifu :verified:
    So brave.
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:38:07 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  16. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:02:31 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    in reply to
    • @chibi[N]ahđŸ‡«đŸ‡·âœ…
    >* Seconde constatation : moins la vaisselle est sale, plus le produit est efficace.
    Absolument magic X)
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 16:02:31 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  17. @chibi[N]ahđŸ‡«đŸ‡·âœ… (alex@social.nah.re)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 14:29:30 EDT @chibi[N]ah🇫🇷✅ @chibi[N]ahđŸ‡«đŸ‡·âœ…
    • Troll 🍖

    On s’est longtemps demandĂ© comment fonctionnait la poudre que l’on met dans le lave-vaisselle.En effet, porte fermĂ©e, il est impossible d’observer son comportement.

    Les publicitĂ©s prĂ©sentant des montages complĂštement absurdesÂč, une Ă©quipe de chercheurs s’est penchĂ© sur la questionÂČ.

    AprĂšs avoir bataillĂ© pendant des mois pour dĂ©bloquer des fonds et obtenir d’un fabricant rĂ©calcitrant un lave-vaisselle avec un capot vitrĂ©, afin de pouvoir observer sous diffĂ©rents angles, le travail de documentation prit quelques semaines.

    Plusieurs marques de produits furent testés, avec et sans produit de rinçage. Des tests de comparaison avec du produit vaisselle ordinaire³ furent également effectués.

    Cependant, au vu des rĂ©sultats et des constatations, confirmĂ©es au microscope, les chercheurs se sont demandĂ©s s’il fallait les publier. En effet, il y avait de quoi se poser des questions, au point oĂč des groupuscules extrĂ©mistes obtus pourraient crier au complot.

    * PremiĂšre constatation : la tempĂ©rature n’influe que peu sur les rĂ©sultats.

    * Seconde constatation : moins la vaisselle est sale, plus le produit est efficace.

    * TroisiĂšme constatation : peu importe la position du bac Ă  poudre, qu’il soit situĂ© en haut ou en bas, l’efficacitĂ© n’est pas changĂ©e.

    * QuatriĂšme constatation, et ce fut celle qui a le plus surpris : chaque grain de poudre est dotĂ© de petites cuisses de grenouille, bien musclĂ©es, et c’est ça qui permet Ă  la poudre de sauter sur les assiettes.

    * CinquiĂšme constatation : si on laisse la poudre trop longtemps dans le bidon ou dans la boĂźte, la poudre tente de s’enfuir en faisant des bonds Ă  l’intĂ©rieur⁎.

    * SixiÚme constatation : le produit vaisselle ne bondissant pas, les assiettes ressortent sales.

    Devant toutes ces constatations, une vague d’appels fut Ă©mis vers tous les fabricants de lave-vaisselle, en exigeant de garder secret ces observations et en imposant des capots devant rester opaques⁶, et ce, en toute circonstance.

    En bref, une petite #MercrediFiction improvisée, sur une idée de @Troll

    –Âč : Avec la poudre truc, c’est le big-bang qui se dĂ©chaĂźne sur les tĂąches. Avec la poudre machin, c’est la BĂ©rĂ©zina de la saletĂ©.ÂČ : Et non LA question, celle oĂč la rĂ©ponse communĂ©ment admise est 42.³ : Pour la vaisselle faite Ă  la main, ou avec le petit appareil oĂč on oublie (Bob) l’éponge.⁎ : Une Ă©tude permettant de dĂ©terminer si un grand stock de produit de lavage stockĂ© Ă  l’abandon dans un hangar peut provoquer des sĂ©ismes⁔ n’a pas encore Ă©tĂ© planifiĂ©e.⁔ : HypothĂšse formulĂ©e mais n’étant pas encore vĂ©rifiĂ©e. Quoique ⁶ : C’est ça qui porte le nom de boĂźte noire. Tout Ă©tant fermĂ©, ce qui se trouve Ă  l’intĂ©rieur ne voit rien, et est donc plongĂ© dans le noir. D’oĂč le nom.

    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 14:29:30 EDT from social.nah.re permalink Repeated by mangeurdenuage
  18. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 14:23:17 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    Water leak repaired, in the end it was just a dead joint.
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 14:23:17 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  19. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 12:47:47 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    https://libre-soc.org/
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 12:47:47 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  20. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 12:46:54 EDT mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
    https://trisquel.info/en/forum/web-browsers-0

    I have recently reached the conclusion that there are no good web browsers, by definition. Some web browsers are a little worse than others in that they are more freedom- or privacy-hostile, but all of them are bad, because by definition a web browser browses the web, and in order to do this, they have to implement web standards, and in doing so they become bad.

    A web standard is a feature that has been implemented in Chrome, adopted by websites optimizing for Chrome, implemented by the other major web browsers in order to be able to browse those websites, and finally declared a standard because it has been implemented by the major web browsers.

    Chromium is the reference implementation of a web browser. Normal standards can be reimplemented by other vendors, but web standards are different.[1] They proliferate at at approximately the same rate as Chromium features, so in order to implement a web browser a vendor must either use Chromium as a base, or reimplement Chromium's features and keep up with Chromium development, which in practice no one has been able to do. There some complete web browsers based on Chromium, some mostly-complete web browsers based on Firefox (which almost keeps up with Chromium development), and many other incomplete web browsers based on Webkit or written from scratch, which are not complete web browsers because they cannot completely browse the web.

    Chromium is free software, so it can be modified to remove some of its antifeatures, like DRM and spyware. Ungoogled Chromium does a pretty good job at this. However, DRM is a web standard, so removing it makes the result no longer a web browser, and in general a downstream project cannot stray too far from Chromium and still be able to browse most of the web.

    Firefox is also free software, so it can be modified to remove its antideatures, like DRM and spyware and trademark restrictions. However, the further a downstream strays from Chromium than Firefox already has, the less of a web browser it is.

    It's possible to write a program from scratch or based on Webkit that can browse some websites, but it will be too different from Chromium to browse much of the web and therefore be not much of a web browser.

    WebBundles[2][3] are a new Chromium feature threatening to become a web standard. There are some browser addons and partial web browsers that break web standards in the interest of user freedom and/or privacy, often by blocking certain non-free or privacy-hostile scripts or requests within web pages. If I understand correctly, a WebBundle dumps everything into a single .wbn file which the browser would load all at once, breaking addons like NoScript and uBlock Origin, as well as browsers with built-in adblocking or tracker-blocking like Brave (trash that no one should use, only mentioned because it's a relevant example) and Eolie, which rely on the ability to allow or block requests from particular domains. This is just the latest in a long series of "features" which make users of the web less free or private.

    It is well-recognized in this community that user freedom can be restricted by copyright law or the witholding of source code. The GPL was designed to address these two threats to user freedom. The GPLv2, however, was vulnerable to another threat to user freedom: Tivoization, where the software can be modifed, but modified versions are not useful because they cannot be used with the needed hardware. The GPLv3 patched this vulnerability, but I believe there are other threats that have not received enough attention. One that comes to mind is client-side software that can be freely modified, but of which modified versions are not useful without non-free server-side software. The problem with the web is that although Chromium can be modified or reimplemented with modifications, the result is only useful insofar as it conforms to Chromium's feature set.

    I think that attempts to create freedom- and privacy-respecting browsers like Ungoogled Chromium, Icecat, Abrowser, and Iceweasel-UPX, though they are valuable temporary mitigations to some of the problems with the modern web, are trying to solve the problem in the wrong place. The problem is not with web browsers, but with the web. If we want to have non-bad web browsers, it is not enough to fork or create an alternative web browser. We need to fork or create an alternative to the web. A fork might be some subset of HTML, with an emphasis on semantic elements that can be handled appropriately by the browser rather than relying on client-side scripting. An alternative might be something like Gemini[4] for document exchange combined with promoting desktop clients over webapps* for more advanced functionality. I don't know, I'm still thinking this through. There will need to be some strategic compromise between what is good and what websites can be persuaded to adopt that is less bad than what they were doing before. But I am pretty convinced at this point that users of web browsers cannot have real freedom while the web itself evolves according to the whims of Google, and while browsers have to race to keep up with what an advertising company decides the web should look like.

    *And that means rejecting Electron too, which extends Google's influence over the web into the desktop as well.
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Sep-2020 12:46:54 EDT from loadaverage.org permalink
  • After
  • Before
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.