♲ @josephfcox@twitter.com: New: here is our definitive investigation into how crime app Citizen is dangerously trying to monetize vigilantism. Documents, Slack chats, product maps, 8 sources
"I didn’t anticipate the ways they would circumvent the police and go that much further."
I don’t buy this, cryptocurrencies have always been about circumventing government control and yet haven’t been seriously considered for regulation until pretty recently, including in China. Like it or not, most financial regulations are there to prevent ordinary people to get fleeced. So it isn’t surprising that cryptocurrencies have become the tool of choice to fleece people on a large scale.
So far every attempt at finding a "cure" that I know of has been focused on making autistic children behave like neurotypical ones through coercion. There is no wisdom collected from promising or looking for a "cure". Only when we leave the lexical field of medical "disease" we can start finding ways to coexist through making the world accessible for all people including neuroatypical people.
I agree with you about quickly resorting to labeling, even wrongly, but doesn't it justify dropping overly broad labels like "Asperger"? You mention lack of communication, why can't we just use specific symptomatic labels?
I do not wish to make you interact more with me, so I'll be brief for the other people who might be interested: autism (like homosexuality) isn't a disease, so there is no cure. Therefore trying to find a cure to something that isn't a disease will be at best fruitless, at worst harmful. The latter already exist in the form of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) that has shown absolutely no benefits for autistic people while using torture-like technique (food deprivation, pain, emotional blackmail) to extract contrived results.
The only "cure" for autism is for the rest of the world to become more accepting and accessible in general (exactly like for homosexuality again), but it has nothing to do with autistic people themselves.
Scammers use cryptocurrencies because it is worth it to do so. A ban would be difficult to enforce completely but it would make them less worth it. For the US, a simple way would be to make commercial exchanges in US dollars like Coinbase illegal. With fewer opportunities for ransomware targets to buy cryptocurrencies and for scammers to retrieve their ill-gotten gains in fiat, it would put a damp on the practice.
I do not agree with that. However, cryptocurrencies were created specifically in a zero-trust environment to circumvent financial regulations. Now, granted, this isn't the main use their creators had for them, but by now the positive uses have been far outweighed by negative ones and as a result cryptocurrencies should be considered an interesting but failed experiment.
I'm old enough to remember malware existed for its own sake, not to make money out of ruining public or semi-public infrastructure.
As far as I understand autism is a multi-dimensional spectrum (I'm probably on) and there is no cure nor good reasons to find one, so what is the purpose to single out autistic people as "Asperger"?
Thanks, I didn't know about the ICD-10, and I have further questions: - Why would the ICD-10 be more trustworthy than the DSM-5? - Why does this particular "feature set" need to be recognized specifically?
♲ @smdiehl@twitter.com: Let's talk about why cryptocurrency is the single factor that created the ransomware plague that is ravaging our healthcare system and public infrastructure. (1/) 🧵
Why do you still cling to the "Asperger" name when even an arguably conservative reference (homosexuality was only removed from mental disorders in 1987, after I was born) doesn't anymore?
♲ @ava@twitter.com: WATCH: I just learned of a prison ship in the South Bronx where 600 people are being held in terrifying conditions. @TakeBackTheBX is organizing protests. My friend @laurapoitras is investigating with #seanvegezzi and asked me to share this intercepted audio. #ShutDownVCBC
The text rings simple and true, but a little too simplistic for my own taste. It is easier said than done, and I believe it has to do with the fact that this drive for more or better isn't entirely artificially engineered. The success of consumerism directly derives from this drive, but did it invent it? I'm not so sure. During my self-isolation I decided on because of the pandemic, I've felt a string restlessness that had little to do with marketing and advertisement. I satisfied it with second-hand LEGO because it kept me busy during a time I couldn't do a lot of stuff I usually do.
Even beyond that, humans have diminishing returns on experiences. We don't get the same thrill re-reading the same book, watching the same movie, looking at the same artwork. We fundamentally enjoy novelty and it fuels the drive that consumerism exploits through FOMO marketing.
So, to be calm is a revolutionary act, not just against the world, but against oneself as well.