Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)

  1. Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 07-Jan-2019 15:10:06 EST Dan Phiffer Dan Phiffer

    Software developers in NYC, here is a job at MoMA Digital Media you should check out. I worked on this team and had a great time.
    https://recruiting.ultipro.com/MUS1002MOMA/JobBoard/9dbfa465-a36a-46c3-b31e-4929830ab266/OpportunityDetail?opportunityId=f539d085-e9b8-4ee3-a0b1-17f1ca5e1a6f

    In conversation Monday, 07-Jan-2019 15:10:06 EST from social.coop permalink
  2. Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 01-Sep-2018 13:03:26 EDT Dan Phiffer Dan Phiffer

    An Open Letter
    https://www.loomio.org/d/gnlFzrpk/an-open-letter

    In conversation Saturday, 01-Sep-2018 13:03:26 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. An open letter
      from Loomio
      Dear fellow members, the events that unfolded over the past few days have put our cooperative to the test, and we failed miserably. Many voices calling for change were silenced in the past, be it by negligence or by sheer lack of commitment by those, whose position of privilege allowed to disregard such calls. By failing to listen, we became the people MLK warned us about: the white moderates who are more devoted to order than to justice. We wasted precious time and energy in endless debates about trivial details, calling for the creation of ever new committees and processes, and we eventually lost sight of the only true reason our cooperative came to existence: to wrestle control of our social media out of the hands of the rich, white, capitalist elite. I am writing this letter to extend my personal apologies to all the people who felt betrayed by our failure and to promise them I am here to put my energy, time, skills and reputation on the line to repair this institution and turn it into a place where they will be safe again. A place for them to call home. But promises are not enough. Words, however strong or emotional, are but empty utterances if they are not followed by swift, honest, transparent action guided by total commitment. And, with your help, I intend to trigger a new course that will shake social.coop at the foundations and turn it into something we will be proud of for years to come. First of all, I invite all those who revel in relativistic attitudes towards racism, sexism, homo/trans-phobia and any other form of bigotry to instantly leave the cooperative and never come back. You are not welcome, and you will never be. Second, I propose we close down registrations for all the time it will take us to heal our cooperative. This might sound like an aggresive move, but I believe it’s the only reasonable thing to do in this diffucult moment. A joint statement will replace our homepage for the time the instance will be closed, to inform people about our struggle to improve. Third, we will follow the advice of those fellow members who chose to weather the storm with us despite being part of those groups we failed to protect in the first place. I will not name names here, but if you have been involved in the chat, you know who I am talking about. We shall reboot the cooperative with a core group of collaborators, deliberately chosen, and not all white men. I invite all men, including myself, to take a back seat in this process unless explicitly asked by the core group. We shall make sure we have social infrastructure in place for handling conflict and abuse before launch, including a rock-solid code of conduct that will state our absolute rejection of any form of hate speech, racism, bigotry and *phobia front and center. We shall grow our core user base deliberately, in small groups, and attempt to tap more diverse networks, to combat the network effects that brought social.coop on the brink of collapse We shall make sure all the skills and resources needed to maintain the organization are in place from the start and focus on sustainability. We can never find ourselves again in the situation where a single member leaving or being overwhelmed with external responsibilities exposes the instance to the risk of downtime, poor performance or sluggish maintenance. We will make sure at least one of the core collaborators is an experienced community manager, with previous experience handling diverse, international communities across many timezones. I chose to stay because I believe we can do much, much better than we did so far, and because I am deeply committed to the idea of platform cooperativism as a means to achieve liberation, justice and equality for all. At the same time I am painfully aware that my position of absolute privilege, which I am granted under the current capitalist partiarchy, puts me at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to understading the needs of those who are oppressed by the same system. My position in the new social.coop will therefore be that of an enthusiastic contributor and ally to those who will be part of the core group and nothing more, unless explicitly asked for, as intellectual honesty demands I give up any position in which I could wield even the slightest bit of power. With respect, hope and unchanged enthusiasm, MK EDIT 02/09/18: replaced "take the instance off-line" with "close down registrations" as many members reported it was misleading and suggested we were going to shut down completely.
  3. Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Thursday, 09-Aug-2018 07:10:38 EDT Dan Phiffer Dan Phiffer

    A longer version of this XKCD is the HOPE panel on voting machines.
    https://livestream.com/internetsociety/hope/videos/178158572 https://social.coop/media/8UbR6FcKQIqcLlO6HXY

    In conversation Thursday, 09-Aug-2018 07:10:38 EDT from social.coop permalink
  4. Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Jun-2018 22:07:22 EDT Dan Phiffer Dan Phiffer

    Today sucked in a lot of ways, but:
    1. saw a beaver in the canal
    2. discovered an ice cream shop within walking distance
    3. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took NY-14

    In conversation Tuesday, 26-Jun-2018 22:07:22 EDT from social.coop permalink
  5. Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Wednesday, 02-May-2018 16:42:54 EDT Dan Phiffer Dan Phiffer
    • I Am My Own Algorithm

    @tbeckett mine does: brooklyn.coop

    In conversation Wednesday, 02-May-2018 16:42:54 EDT from social.coop permalink
  6. Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Wednesday, 02-May-2018 10:59:06 EDT Dan Phiffer Dan Phiffer

    MaaS: Mastodon as a Service
    https://www.loomio.org/d/jgGJ8ucA/proposal-to-take-over-a-mastodon-hosting-service-hosting-external-instances-but-also-to-enable-the-creation-of-thematic-sister-coop-instances?utm_campaign=new_discussion&utm_medium=email&utm_source=thread_mailer

    In conversation Wednesday, 02-May-2018 10:59:06 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. Proposal to take over a Mastodon hosting service, hosting external instances, but also to enable the creation of thematic sister coop-instances
      from Loomio
      I've been put in touch with Alice, who runs the Mastodon hosting service https://maastodon.net (currently hosting 38 instances with 171,652 accounts, including the mothership instance https://mastodon.social) and wants to either find a way to share the workload, or transfer it to another person/group. Of course, I suggested turning it into a co-op! And here's what she replied (and said I could share here to see if we might be interested): I really like that model and can only wish MaaS becomes a coop. Financially, the service is slightly profitable, the income over the previous two months was 182€ and 293€. The current servers cost 175€/month (209€ with taxes, it could be lowered with some changes) Technically, it works okay but require constant attention (mostly for mastodon.social's traffic bursts). It has some custom software that'd I'd be happy to continue working on, in a less pressured context, and see open-source. (i can't guarantee my time without a remuneration, but i would help the migration in any case). It's all already highly automated, including billing and instance setup. Given the right resources and maintenance/scaling it doesn't require much intervention except answering support tickets. My main issue with it is that i can't healthily handle such pressure alone, i just feel more and more crushed by a thing that's visibly too heavy. I think that while Alice might not have the energy to start up a co-op from scratch, she would probably be happy to transfer it to us (we'd give her a token payout) and become a member of social.coop instead where she could be part of the soon-to-exist Tech Ops team. It seems to me that this ties in perfectly with our bigger vision for social.coop from the beginning (creating a model for user-controlled social platforms, to then inspire/help others do the same). And now that we've reached 1000 members, the question of scaling is relevant, and I personally think horizontal scaling is preferable (for both technical and social reasons). We could use a similar model as Q&A service StackExchange for creating new communities (see http://area51.stackexchange.com/faq) which could result in sister instances like art.social.coop, science.social.coop, or even aww.social rather than sticking with one increasingly noisy and general instance. As for the external instances already hosted by Alice: https://maastodon.net/instances/ they could be a secondary source of funds for social.coop which would help remunerate the ever-more-needed Tech Ops team. Of course, we could then prod the instance admins to see about turning them into #platformcoops (or becoming sister instances of social.coop just like the hypothetical aww.social) Imagine announcing that mastodon.social is now a #platformcoop! It's no #BuyTwitter but still pretty cool :wink: Another option, in case the whole social.coop collective doesn't want to take this on, woud be to create a small worker-coop to manage maastodon.net and possibly "outsource' the hosting/maintenance of social.coop to that coop. I'm keen to hear what people think, especially those members for which this would mean extra labour (even though the beauty here is collectivisation of effort, it's might be 2x more work to maintain 10 instances compared to 1, not 10x), and so will wait for some feedback before posting starting any polls.
  7. Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 09-Apr-2018 22:32:10 EDT Dan Phiffer Dan Phiffer
    • Christian Bundy

    @christianbundy I have a project like that: http://occupyhere.org/

    I’m also working on the offline mapping scenario.

    In conversation Monday, 09-Apr-2018 22:32:10 EDT from social.coop permalink
  8. Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 07-Apr-2018 10:48:21 EDT Dan Phiffer Dan Phiffer

    Come work with me at the ACLU: https://www.aclu.org/careers/back-end-engineer-platform-ptec-13-product-technology-department-new-york-ny

    In conversation Saturday, 07-Apr-2018 10:48:21 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. Back-End Engineer, Platform [PTEC-13], Product & Technology Department, New York, NY
      from American Civil Liberties Union
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.