Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. ∑ XahLee (xahlee@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:30:52 EDT ∑ XahLee ∑ XahLee

    Safari sucks donkey ass. Firefox sucks donkey ass.

    In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:30:52 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
    1. Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣ (chriswilson@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:38:26 EDT Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣ Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣
      in reply to

      @xahlee I long for a lean browser engine. All of it just eats memory.....for what ???

      In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:38:26 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
      1. ∑ XahLee (xahlee@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:40:14 EDT ∑ XahLee ∑ XahLee
        in reply to

        @ChrisWilson on my dodgy machine, chrome is doing very well.
        that is, chrome vs firefox vs opera.
        Firefox sucks by far. Don't know about Edge, i think it should be good... but, was surprised nobody uses.

        In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:40:14 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
        1. ∑ XahLee (xahlee@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:40:37 EDT ∑ XahLee ∑ XahLee
          in reply to

          @ChrisWilson it's also pretty sad, because google is now skynet evil.

          In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:40:37 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
      2. ay (ayy@gs.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:55:45 EDT ay ay
        in reply to
        @chriswilson @xahlee For running javascript trackers and ads duh.
        In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 05:55:45 EDT from gs.smuglo.li permalink
        1. Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣ (chriswilson@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:04:52 EDT Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣ Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣
          in reply to

          @ayy @xahlee ad nausaum ? Is an opposite to an ad blocker. It's an ad clicker and floods the trackers with meaningless data. You can either give them silence or, if that doesn't work, give them noise

          In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:04:52 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
          1. ay (ayy@gs.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:09:19 EDT ay ay
            in reply to
            @chriswilson @xahlee I think using ad nausaum is very ill advised. You will be selectively screwing over the websites and writers that you like.
            In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:09:19 EDT from gs.smuglo.li permalink
            1. ∑ XahLee (xahlee@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:10:21 EDT ∑ XahLee ∑ XahLee
              in reply to

              @ayy @ChrisWilson indeed.

              In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:10:21 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
          2. ∑ XahLee (xahlee@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:12:22 EDT ∑ XahLee ∑ XahLee
            in reply to

            @ChrisWilson @ayy the solution to bad ads or ads at all, is simply not to click it, or don't visit the website.

            the use of ad blocker, is scum, and actually makes things worse. Of course, open source fanatics or hacker geeks loves the ad blocker idea, which made things far worse long run. Witness since 2000.

            In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:12:22 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
            1. ay (ayy@gs.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:14:49 EDT ay ay
              in reply to
              @xahlee @chriswilson I block ads myself, but I wouldn't use ad nausaum, because It is way more harmful.
              In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:14:49 EDT from gs.smuglo.li permalink
              1. Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣ (chriswilson@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:18:08 EDT Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣ Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣
                in reply to

                @ayy please explain.... I have been looking into some ideas like that. Volume usage would help

                @xahlee

                In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:18:08 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
                1. ay (ayy@gs.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:22:33 EDT ay ay
                  in reply to
                  @chriswilson @xahlee Well imagine that there is a blog about some opinions you are interested in. Imagine that 10% of people reading that blog use ad nausaum. Then that person will likely be banned from ad networks. He will stop making any money and may stop blogging because of it. Soon no one writes from your perspective anymore, because it will be a financial suicide.

                  But this other person who writes about opinions you dont like. He doesnt get any fake ad clicks so he keeps making money.
                  In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:22:33 EDT from gs.smuglo.li permalink
                  1. Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣ (chriswilson@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:34:10 EDT Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣ Sir Chris Wilson 3️⃣3️⃣
                    in reply to

                    @ayy fair call.

                    But I guess that's where the value for value works, and ad revenue becomes irrelevant, trouble is, outside No Agenda, I don't know anyone able to go full time without relying on some ad revenue. Many not left content creators are finding out how recently :-)

                    @xahlee

                    In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:34:10 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
            2. Silent Ice Cream (silenticecream@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:50:54 EDT Silent Ice Cream Silent Ice Cream
              in reply to

              @xahlee @ayy @ChrisWilson Malvertising. That is why I use ad blockers.

              In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 06:50:54 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
            3. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 09:09:20 EDT lnxw48a1 lnxw48a1
              in reply to
              @xahlee @ChrisWilson @ayy Browsing without adblock tempts ad-supported sites to generate accidental clicks. Witness the various pop-up techniques, such as the ones that arise as you scroll over text.
              Don't click: doesn't work when tricks generate accidental clicks
              Don't visit: users don't always know site is evil about being ad-supported until they click a link
              Solution is adblock and / or script block
              In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 09:09:20 EDT from nu.federati.net permalink
              1. ∑ XahLee (xahlee@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 15:13:16 EDT ∑ XahLee ∑ XahLee
                in reply to

                @lnxw48a1 @ayy @ChrisWilson
                no. just don't click. and if they do popup or aggravate, simply don't visit.
                And to a point when they are too much, they'll fall.

                also, it is the proper thing to do.

                as simple as that.

                it's called capitalism.

                adblock, privacy law, “regulation” law, and mob anger to tell company what to do as if you have a right, all just makes it far worse.

                witness years 2000 to today.

                In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 15:13:16 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
                1. ∑ XahLee (xahlee@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 15:13:45 EDT ∑ XahLee ∑ XahLee
                  in reply to

                  @ChrisWilson @ayy @lnxw48a1
                  we got where we are today, where privacy is not possible, cloud is impossible to avoid, cookie and js can't be turned off, is result.

                  In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 15:13:45 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
                  1. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 15:58:04 EDT lnxw48a1 lnxw48a1
                    in reply to
                    @xahlee We got where we are because people don't (intentionally) click ads. Ad networks and ad supported sites think they are entitled to have people view ads, in the hope that the more ads people view, the more likely they'll accidentally click one. And that's all it is.
                    In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 15:58:04 EDT from nu.federati.net permalink
                2. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 15:50:59 EDT lnxw48a1 lnxw48a1
                  in reply to
                  @xahlee Just don't click *does not work* ... nobody intentionally clicks on ads. That's why ad networks started spying on us. It is also why the ads move, pop-up, and obscure site content.
                  Avoiding ad-supported sites doesn't work because people post links to sites (FB, T, etc; even here).
                  The *only things that work* are adblock and scriptblock.
                  In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 15:50:59 EDT from nu.federati.net permalink
    2. Dr Neil (drneilmb@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Sep-2017 12:16:30 EDT Dr Neil Dr Neil
      in reply to

      @xahlee and Chrome is spying on me. Time for IE now?

      In conversation Monday, 18-Sep-2017 12:16:30 EDT from noagendasocial.com permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.