Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. tekk (tekk@social.tekk.in)'s status on Saturday, 23-Dec-2017 10:02:52 EST tekk tekk
    Quick shower thought for everyone: the HTML doctype is useless. The doctype is unversioned and so you can never use it to say "this html is invalid" because it may just be a newer 'version' than you implement.
    In conversation Saturday, 23-Dec-2017 10:02:52 EST from social.tekk.in permalink
    1. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Saturday, 23-Dec-2017 11:00:16 EST lnxw48a1 lnxw48a1
      in reply to
      @tekk Pre-HTML5 doctypes were versioned. (For example, see HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0.) But since HTML5 is just "Guess Your Best" tag soup anyway, you'd probably have your user-agent just render what it understands and ignore what it doesn't.
      In conversation Saturday, 23-Dec-2017 11:00:16 EST from nu.federati.net permalink
      1. tekk (tekk@social.tekk.in)'s status on Saturday, 23-Dec-2017 11:15:08 EST tekk tekk
        in reply to
        @lnxw48a1 yeah, that was what I was getting at. There's no reason for requiring a doctype now when it's meaningless
        In conversation Saturday, 23-Dec-2017 11:15:08 EST from social.tekk.in permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.