@strypey @apertus Well, micro-blogging is also some kind of direct communication, establishing direct talking to each other and having also the possibility to write longer postings has some positive side-effects because being restricted is never good. ;-)
@strypey @apertus Just have in mind that reducing our communication has also major negative influences as leaving our society with reduced amount of patience and the expectant attitude for having every complex problem declared (and already solved) within shortened messages.
Of course this is also a shortened description of real bigger problem itself from my side, but it's already noticable that with #Twitter and Co. most discussions are not that kind of long. Therefore my thesis here and also my attitude towards a good middle way.
@strypey @therealpennyfortheguy Well you need even more messages to write down your thoughts. I think it's a good for #GNUSocial having no further restrictions and possibilities within an initial configuration for an instance and having also no restrictions on the interface itself. Besides the thoughts and discussions are more valuable for me than any "look and feel" of the stream itself. :-)
@strypey @therealpennyfortheguy When blogging comes also to some discussions, I'm with you. But when looking around we are loosing so-called discussion culture and therefore I don't give much on the user-experience itself. It's about staying in touch with thoughts, bigger or lesser in articulation and writing. :-)
@strypey It depends on the sender and the level of trust. But as spoken out from @therealpennyforthegu ... I would not accept the attachment itself without questioning. But that's another use-case: We are just talking about the amount of text and the user-experience inbound. I have no problem when you have another view on that, but it's all about reducing our communication with no further reason: I had also enough examples on #Diaspora and comparable platforms ... people tend to just simplified contexts, breaking up with discussions and talks, also with no reason or just the short comment on their own echochamber being unharmed. That's my drive in that, because I want a free society with free talks and openminded, reasonable discussions. Otherwise we won't solve our problems with simplified messages and talks.
@strypey @therealpennyfortheguy Sorry, that's my fault because I have read about "attachment" within the discussion. But you won't fix it either when demanding for "user-experience"! That's my point. We won't have a final conclusion on that point because there is no such easy solution in the end. But the problem is here: Shortened messages for complex. And being honest: There is no amount of text defined to be sent via email, so of course I'd like to read a wall. Nevertheless: Copying a complete book is a bit overdriven comparison. :-)
@strypey Yes I've read that already: Thanks for insights, your view, propably some alternatives, ideas and a nice discussion at all! :) Wishing you a nice time, until we read again perhaps!
@strypey No need for a flame war, because I'd love to hear and read different opinions and looking forward to combine them in a complete new paradigm. :)
@strypey @apertus @throgh Having a 1000 chars here to play with does come in handy. Especially when 140 or 500 chars just doesn't cut it, when one really needs to use ALL of it.