Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Tomas SA2TMS (tomas@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2018 07:45:47 EST Tomas SA2TMS Tomas SA2TMS
    There's nothing wrong with XML. In fact JSON folks are busy reinventing everything XML does, poorly
    In conversation Wednesday, 07-Feb-2018 07:45:47 EST from social.umeahackerspace.se permalink
    1. Ben Pfaff (blp@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2018 18:21:53 EST Ben Pfaff Ben Pfaff
      in reply to
      @tomas @elizafox XML is big and complicated, JSON is simple. A production-quality JSON parser in C is <2000 lines. Sometimes this matters.
      In conversation Wednesday, 07-Feb-2018 18:21:53 EST from quitter.se permalink
      1. Tomas SA2TMS (tomas@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2018 05:01:03 EST Tomas SA2TMS Tomas SA2TMS
        in reply to
        Sure. Not that libexpat is particularly large at ~18 kloc. libxerces-c on the other hand..
        In conversation Thursday, 08-Feb-2018 05:01:03 EST from social.umeahackerspace.se permalink
      2. MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2018 11:20:10 EST MMN-o ✅⃠ MMN-o ✅⃠
        in reply to
        @blp Then again, the JSON feature list is this long: |--| and XML's is: |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| (not to scale)
        In conversation Thursday, 08-Feb-2018 11:20:10 EST from social.umeahackerspace.se permalink
        1. Ben Pfaff (blp@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2018 13:15:59 EST Ben Pfaff Ben Pfaff
          in reply to
          @mmn Absolutely. If you don't need the features of XML, JSON is a reasonable choice. If you do need XML, you know where to get it ;-)
          In conversation Thursday, 08-Feb-2018 13:15:59 EST from quitter.se permalink
        2. tuttle (tuttle@somsants.net)'s status on Sunday, 11-Feb-2018 05:01:56 EST tuttle tuttle
          in reply to
          @tomas@social.umeahackerspace.se Everyone was talking about this new fandangled API technology. When I got round to looking at it.. "ah, it's xmp-rpc"
          In conversation Sunday, 11-Feb-2018 05:01:56 EST from somsants.net permalink
          1. Tomas SA2TMS (tomas@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Sunday, 11-Feb-2018 05:53:51 EST Tomas SA2TMS Tomas SA2TMS
            in reply to
            @tuttle One always finds one's burden again. But the webdevs teaches us the higher fidelity that negates standards and reinvents RPC. They too conclude that all is well. This fediverse henceforth without a master seems to them neither sterile nor futile. Each Atom process on their computers, each line of redundant work written on those star-filled nights, in themselves, forms a world. The struggle itself toward reimplementation is enough to fill their hearts. One must imagine webdevs happy.
            In conversation Sunday, 11-Feb-2018 05:53:51 EST from social.umeahackerspace.se permalink
    2. danielside (danielside@gs.dnlsd.nom.es)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2018 13:48:31 EST danielside danielside
      in reply to
      xml and xsl are among the greatest inventions
      In conversation Wednesday, 07-Feb-2018 13:48:31 EST from gs.dnlsd.nom.es permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.