Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Tomas SA2TMS (tomas@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Friday, 16-Mar-2018 06:33:36 EDT Tomas SA2TMS Tomas SA2TMS
    I've had a thought about #AGPL. If a provider uses non-AGPL software to federate with one or more AGPL servers, does that software then become covered by the AGPL? Seems to me such a service would make what amounts to function calls to the AGPL server(s), similar to the RPC loophole the AGPL is designed to close.

    Put another way: is it possible to write an implementation of OStatus or ActivityPub that is not de facto AGPL. It most likely would have to interact with/make function calls to GNU Social, Mastodon, postActiv, PeerTube etc, all of which are AGPL
    In conversation Friday, 16-Mar-2018 06:33:36 EDT from social.umeahackerspace.se permalink
    1. Tomas SA2TMS (tomas@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Friday, 16-Mar-2018 06:35:19 EDT Tomas SA2TMS Tomas SA2TMS
      in reply to
      Typo: "de facto AGPL" should have a question mark at the end
      In conversation Friday, 16-Mar-2018 06:35:19 EDT from social.umeahackerspace.se permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.