Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. clacke@libranet.de ❌ (notclacke@pleroma.soykaf.com)'s status on Sunday, 18-Mar-2018 21:48:33 EDT   clacke@libranet.de ❌ clacke@libranet.de ❌
    > Quite broadly in tech, and especially in Enterprise, "new" versions of software are considered inherently insecure or unstable.
    > But for all but .1% of Open Source, the opposite is true. Older versions do not contain critical fixes, including security patches.
    > This is especially problematic in the "Enterprise Linux" world.
    > You simply cannot get package managers to take new versions.


    > OSS Reality Check:
    > 1) Most projects are unmaintained.
    > 2) Projects that are maintained only maintain the latest release line.
    > 3) Dependency graphs are too large to be managed by humans. If you are a human un-supported by automation your deps are out of date.
    > 4) Almost all the software you depend on contain undisclosed security vulnerabilities that, in the future, will be disclosed.

    https://twitter.com/mikeal/status/911366255646351360
    In conversation Sunday, 18-Mar-2018 21:48:33 EDT from pleroma.soykaf.com permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.