Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. deutrino (deutrino@mstdn.io)'s status on Thursday, 29-Mar-2018 14:39:34 EDT deutrino deutrino

    I have a DIMM with a bad bit which #memtest (86+ v 5.01) reports at 0045de6fa98, but it gives me #badram pattern of badram=0xdde6fa98,0xfffffffc ... Am I right to be concerned about the discrepancy in the upper bits between the reported address and the badram line? This is an i7 960 with 18GiB RAM in 6 DIMMs and (of course) will be running a 64 bit kernel. @catoutofbed

    In conversation Thursday, 29-Mar-2018 14:39:34 EDT from mstdn.io permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.