I always felt like snappy/flatpak/appimage were stupid ideas, but didn't exactly know why.
Then someone wrote this article
http://kmkeen.com/maintainers-matter/
and suddenly it all makes sense.
I always felt like snappy/flatpak/appimage were stupid ideas, but didn't exactly know why.
Then someone wrote this article
http://kmkeen.com/maintainers-matter/
and suddenly it all makes sense.
@Wolf480pl The thing this article doesn't address is what a user is meant to do when $application hasn't been packaged for their distro or for Linux. Not all users know how to compile and package.
I think upstream deserves a reasonable packaging method for Linux. I'm happy to encourage my users to opt for package manager FIRST and AppImage second, but I'm not OK with "outside" developers not knowing how to deliver to Linux because we have no universal format to provide.
Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.