Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Nathan Schneider (ntnsndr@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Jul-2018 11:22:56 EDT Nathan Schneider Nathan Schneider

    The proposed revision to the #SocialCoop bylaws has passed. It's not perfect, but hopefully it helps us clarify the process before we move forward with other, more substantive revisions: https://www.loomio.org/p/1PSop0v2/bylaws-revision-clarify-proposal-process

    @mayel, could you make the changes to the socal.coop/bylaws page?

    In conversation Tuesday, 10-Jul-2018 11:22:56 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. File without filename could not get a thumbnail source.
      Bylaws revision: Clarify proposal process
      from Loomio
      Based on this discussion and proposal (https://www.loomio.org/p/xrpF4Scw/bylaws-decision-process-clarification) in the Governance Working Group, we propose a modification in the wording of the bylaws in order to address some confusion that has arisen about the meaning of the existing terms, particularly regarding the procedural status of the Abstain and Block tools. This is not intended to be a change to the bylaws, although the discussion it has aroused indicates that there is interest in more significant future alterations to the decision-making process. Those discussions can begin in appropriate threads in the Governance Working Group. The proposed adjustments are as follows. Under the "Governance" heading, this section: At least 6 days allowed for members to weigh in on the proposal A shorter period is permitted for proposals labeled URGENT in the Title, along with a specified and valid justification in the Details Agreement by at least 50% of voting members No blocks, unless 90% agreement is reached Should be changed to this: At least 6 days allowed for members to participate A shorter period is permitted for proposals labeled URGENT in the Title, along with a justification in the Details More Agree votes than Disagree votes Abstain votes allow members to register opinions or concerns without being counted. A Block vote represents a fundamental disagreement—a belief that the proposal violates Social.coop's core principles. Proposals with Block require at least 9 times more Agree votes than Disagree and Block votes in order to pass. And under the "Modifications" section, this section: These bylaws may be modified at any time through a proposal passing in the full group as follows: At least 10 days allowed for members to weigh in Agreement by at least 75% of voting members No blocks, unless 95% agreement is reached Should be changed to this: These bylaws may be modified at any time through a proposal passing in the full group under the same rules as stated above, except requiring a 10-day period of participation, at least 3 times as many Agree votes as Disagree votes, and, if there is a Block, least 9.5 times more Agree votes than Disagree and Block votes. END OF PROPOSED CHANGES
    1. Mayel - ghost account (mayel@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 10-Jul-2018 12:40:10 EDT Mayel - ghost account Mayel - ghost account
      in reply to

      @ntnsndr done! can you please check that it's correct?

      In conversation Tuesday, 10-Jul-2018 12:40:10 EDT from social.coop permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.