@SLRock the linux version is working. It's pretty slick, actually. The real test will be web development, but so far, it has not disappointed. That said, installing it under OpenSUSE requires choosing the "install this all broken and stupid" option because someone decided to capitalize GConf2 in a package name at RedHack. Works perfectly, though.
@YoVinnie@yukiame@Combaticus RE: Brave test-drive. It has some things I don't like -- the heavy home/new tab page is reminiscent of Vivaldi. This is a 16 core Xeon system -- _nothing_ should hiccup or lag. Brave (and Vivaldi) both do a bit here and there. As a developer, I find not being able to dock the inspector unacceptable. Finally, the Linux-side UI is not as developed or as clean as the Mac/Windows version.
On the plus side: mostly VERY fast. Ad and beacon blocking works VERY well.
@Combaticus@YoVinnie@yukiame Aesthetics matter to me, too. I had a Mac on my desk (usually as an adjunct machine) from the late 1980s to about 2 years ago when I retired my last iMac. Since that time, my entire development (and arts) toolchains are supported under Linux. To meet my aesthetic requirements, the only option is KDE, but I actually like it better than the Mac. Having control over fonts without hacking helps. :-)
@Combaticus@YoVinnie@yukiame Once upon a time, Apple was pretty good at a designing a desktop, and... remember when MySpace let users customize profiles? There's a certain wisdom in locking down the aesthetic controls. However, for those of us who are "aesthetic engineers," that kind of restriction is patronizing.
@Lordimpala RE: Email - depends on your platform. For Gnome/Linux there's Evolution, for KDE there's Kontact, there's CLAWS, Balsa, Sylpheed, Geary... Mail.app was mostly tolerable on the Mac, and I have no idea what Windows people would use other than Outlook... or GMail.