Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account (thorthenorseman@octodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 06-Oct-2018 16:31:10 EDT 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account

    I take back what I said about getting a Linksys LAPAC1750 instead of LAPAC1200 if you need more channels. That model is no less limited in terms of available channels. It mystifies me that these business access points lack 2 entire 5 GHz bands that Asus' home routers handle without a hitch. Buying business access points instead of home routers hasn't paid any dividends yet. They have more advanced networking features, but I could've lived without those.

    In conversation Saturday, 06-Oct-2018 16:31:10 EDT from octodon.social permalink
    1. 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account (thorthenorseman@octodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 06-Oct-2018 16:36:11 EDT 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account
      in reply to

      How are you meant to use the full 80 MHz channel width at 5 GHz on these LAPAC1200 access points if have a building with more than one access point? The only way of getting non-overlapping channels with these is to reduce the bandwidth to 40 MHz.

      I should have read the data sheet more carefully, but to be honest, I took the tri-band functionality on the Asus routers I already had for granted, and assumed that every other 5 GHz WiFi radio was capable of it.

      In conversation Saturday, 06-Oct-2018 16:36:11 EDT from octodon.social permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.