Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account (thorthenorseman@octodon.social)'s status on Friday, 19-Oct-2018 16:10:26 EDT 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account

    Clojure looks more sane than Common Lisp to me. The symbols aren't complete madness and there is interoperability with Java. That's a far safer bet than living in your own little Lisp universe. Much, much better first impression than with Common Lisp, and I expect I can probably use this without needing to also learn Emacs and Slime.

    Unfortunately, they don't use Clojure at that Lisp job I might apply for.

    In conversation Friday, 19-Oct-2018 16:10:26 EDT from octodon.social permalink
    1. 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account (thorthenorseman@octodon.social)'s status on Friday, 19-Oct-2018 16:14:05 EDT 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account 🇳🇴 Thor — backup account
      in reply to

      Clojure is a bit more prescriptive about the functional style, though. You're not supposed to have mutable variables. I mean, my code generally contains very few mutable variables, and I'm in the habit of const'ing most things, but it does occasionally happen that I use a let.

      In conversation Friday, 19-Oct-2018 16:14:05 EDT from octodon.social permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.