Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. .:Ninjatrappeur:. (ninjatrappeur@social.alternativebit.fr)'s status on Thursday, 18-Oct-2018 02:24:47 EDT .:Ninjatrappeur:. .:Ninjatrappeur:.
    @kragen

    > displays take 750mW for 120ms to do a 1-bit (non-grayscale) update,

    I think the problem is a little bit more complex. As I mentionned in my article, you basically have 4 different way to update a pixel, 8 if you have a partial refresh system.

    It'll mostly depend on the current color of the pixel as well as the desired color.

    So in the case of a white -> black or black -> white full update, you're going to draw some serious intensity for at least 3 seconds where in the case of a white -> white fast refresh, you'll probably end up not drawing any power at all.

    What I'm trying to say is that I think you can go pretty far in term of power efficiency with a e-ink display (mostly by leveraging their bi-stable nature).
    In conversation Thursday, 18-Oct-2018 02:24:47 EDT from social.alternativebit.fr permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.