Conversation

It is not *literally* true that every time I open Adam Becker's /What Is Real?/, I find an error of physics, history or philosophy, but it is true to an excellent approximation. My colleague Chris Fuchs noticed some problems: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.05147

Tom Siegfried found some that both Chris and I had missed: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/beyond-weird-and-what-real-try-make-sense-quantum-weirdness

And I have pages more. tl;dr Becker needed a villain and chose Niels Bohr.