Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Don Romano (alt) (thor@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 13:37:18 EST Don Romano (alt) Don Romano (alt)

    The whole point of federated networks is that you must be a system administrator to be in control of your data and your identity on the network? That isn't good enough. Most people can't be expected to do this, and are thus at the mercy of the instance owners, much like Twitter users are at the mercy of Twitter. Hardly an improvement, and actually slightly worse in this case, since the discussion was prompted by the guy shutting down this instance for several days.

    In conversation Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 13:37:18 EST from noagendasocial.com permalink
    1. Don Romano (alt) (thor@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 13:55:30 EST Don Romano (alt) Don Romano (alt)
      in reply to

      I'm not convinced that federation is the right model for a libre social medium. I think a decentralised model is better. Having instances form a network is a good idea, but tying user identities to them isn't.

      It would be better to use cryptographic key pairs for identification. To register, you'd submit a cryptographically signed user name claim to the network. A blockchain could be used to prove that you claimed it first.

      In conversation Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 13:55:30 EST from noagendasocial.com permalink
      1. Don Romano (alt) (thor@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 14:00:52 EST Don Romano (alt) Don Romano (alt)
        in reply to

        Your key pair would be generated for you by the client/browser and would be derived from your chosen passphrase. You could change your keypair at any time by submitting a public key change announcement to the blockchain, signed with your old private key. GUI-wise, it would just look like you're changing your password, of course.

        In conversation Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 14:00:52 EST from noagendasocial.com permalink
      2. Don Romano (alt) (thor@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 14:01:28 EST Don Romano (alt) Don Romano (alt)
        in reply to

        Your key pair would be generated for you by the client/browser and would be derived from your chosen passphrase. You could change your keypair at any time by submitting a public key change announcement to the blockchain, signed with your old private key. GUI-wise, it would just look like you're changing your passphrase, of course.

        In conversation Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 14:01:28 EST from noagendasocial.com permalink
        1. Don Romano (alt) (thor@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 14:21:50 EST Don Romano (alt) Don Romano (alt)
          in reply to

          The Fediverse model of selective federation is annoying, frankly, but it probably wouldn't be desirable for every server in the network to stream the full network either. I think there needs to be some notion of named groups or spaces that anyone could create and moderate.

          In conversation Saturday, 23-Feb-2019 14:21:50 EST from noagendasocial.com permalink
    2. mangeurdenuage (mangeurdenuage@loadaverage.org)'s status on Sunday, 24-Feb-2019 09:25:16 EST mangeurdenuage mangeurdenuage
      in reply to
      Usage of computer requires knowledge, if you abstract that knowledge then the people who uses the many layers of abstractions will be dependent on those who created/controls them.
      In conversation Sunday, 24-Feb-2019 09:25:16 EST from loadaverage.org permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.