Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Mark A. Gibbs (indi@sn.genesismachina.ca)'s status on Thursday, 18-Apr-2019 10:32:47 EDT Mark A. Gibbs Mark A. Gibbs
    The second major argument of religious accessories ban supporters is the "they're just advertisements" claim, that states - without evidence, of course - the supporter's opinion that religious accessories are nothing more than billboards to advertise or proselytize the wearer's faith. Let's see how that stands up to real evidence. https://www.canadianatheist.com/2019/04/religious-accessories-bans-5-proselytizing-by-accessories/ !atheism !secular !SecularHumanism
    In conversation Thursday, 18-Apr-2019 10:32:47 EDT from sn.genesismachina.ca permalink

    Attachments

    1. Religious accessories bans are wrong: Proselytizing by accessories
      By Indi from Canadian Atheist
      We don’t allow people to wear advertisements to work, and most of the time we don’t even allow them to wear statements of political affiliation. So why do we allow people to wear statements of reli…
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.