I'll make this clear: Much like you're unlikely to be swayed in your opinion about global warming by bits of trivia that I offer, I'm also unlikely to be swayed by bits of trivia that you offer. Why? Because whatever bits of trivia you offer me will look cherry picked to support your opinion. You will feel similarly about whatever I have to offer. The same goes for any serious accusations or conspiracy theories. Citing sources? Also cherry picking. These discussions are therefore pointless.
Conversation
Notices
-
Don Romano (alt) (thor@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Tuesday, 30-Apr-2019 16:16:18 EDT Don Romano (alt) -
Don Romano (alt) (thor@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Tuesday, 30-Apr-2019 16:27:07 EDT Don Romano (alt) As I see it, the issue of global warming can be debated to death and no consensus of public opinion will ever be reached.
Therefore, the only thing we can do as laypeople in this matter is form opinions and vote according to that.
It's terribly uninteresting to have arguments I have already dismissed repeated to me. I'm not really here for that. I'm aware of the opposing side's arguments. I have considered them. I don't agree with them. The end.
-