Conversation

Notices

1. musicman (musicman@nu.federati.net)'s status on Wednesday, 15-May-2019 21:12:02 EDT musicman
   This gives me the output I want as a starter
   
   curl -X POST https://sandbox.plaid.com/institutions/get -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{
   "client_id": "5cc312cee54277001312d232",
   "secret": "fc3906bc934b52a10df62c11f0e94e",
   "count": 500,
   "offset": 50000
   }' 2>&1 | grep 77
   100 203 100 77 100 126 255 418 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 674
   
   Then though, I want the 4th column. It seems like awk is performing the operation on the initial output, not the grepped output, as seen below.
   
   Any tips?
   
   d@zareason:~/quickstart/python$ curl -X POST https://sandbox.plaid.com/institutions/get -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{
   "client_id": "5cc312cee54277001312d232",
   "secret": "fc3906bc934b52a10df62c11f0e94e",
   "count": 500,
   "offset": 50000
   }' 2>&1 | grep 77 | awk '{print $4}'
   0
   d@zareason:~/quickstart/python$ curl -X POST https://sandbox.plaid.com/institutions/get -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{
   "client_id": "5cc312cee54277001312d232",
   "secret": "fc3906bc934b52a10df62c11f0e94e",
   "count": 500,
   "offset": 50000
   }' 2>&1 | grep 77 | awk '{print $5}'
   0
   d@zareason:~/quickstart/python$ curl -X POST https://sandbox.plaid.com/institutions/get -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{
   "client_id": "5cc312cee54277001312d232",
   "secret": "fc3906bc934b52a10df62c11f0e94e",
   "count": 500,
   "offset": 50000
   }' 2>&1 | awk '{print $5}'
   %
   Left
   0
   1. musicman (musicman@nu.federati.net)'s status on Wednesday, 15-May-2019 21:14:15 EDT musicman

      in reply to
      and yes, I know I published the secret. It's a sandbox and I rotated it anyway
   2. musicman (musicman@nu.federati.net)'s status on Wednesday, 15-May-2019 21:16:36 EDT musicman

      in reply to
      I have discovered a simpler solution
      1. musicman (musicman@nu.federati.net)'s status on Wednesday, 15-May-2019 21:17:37 EDT musicman

         in reply to
         wait, no I didn't. I solved a different issue. this issue remains
         1. musicman (musicman@nu.federati.net)'s status on Wednesday, 15-May-2019 21:18:55 EDT musicman

            in reply to
            although, there may well be better way to write this loop. Gotta write a loop regardless