tomasino@MG it's a confusing page. First it's the article based on the guy hearing something wrong which he addresses in the addendums, but then doubles down that it's still a thing. Meanwhile protonmail is like, none of this is true and also we can't spy on end to end encryption. And then the guy is arguing that they weren't specifically addressing the statements at the top which were misheard... I think?
I'm really not sure what to take away
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the