the more i think about it, the more i conclude that @sir is right and git forges aren’t the right answer.
Conversation
Notices
-
:abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: (kaniini@pleroma.site)'s status on Friday, 12-Jul-2019 05:57:59 EDT :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy:
-
:abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: (kaniini@pleroma.site)'s status on Friday, 12-Jul-2019 05:58:10 EDT :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy:
which is really a shame because i hate email -
:abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: (kaniini@pleroma.site)'s status on Friday, 12-Jul-2019 05:58:40 EDT :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy:
but sourcehut has a very compelling workflow -
:abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: (kaniini@pleroma.site)'s status on Friday, 12-Jul-2019 06:13:30 EDT :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy:
what i like about sourcehut is that it just connects tools together. i think this is an example of @sir at his most brilliant.
you can have an email workflow, or not.
you can have web-based reviews, or not.
what is most compelling is that, with functional ActivityPub groups, we could have a workflow where we discuss the changes right here, in the fediverse, and reach consensus on it, and then it makes it into the repo. all of this is possible because of the sourcehut plumbing.
-
-
Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Friday, 12-Jul-2019 06:00:04 EDT Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
@kaniini I hate web much more than email…
t. pleroma dev
-
-