Isn't it typical when reading articles about music that when you go and actually check out what the critic or music journalist is writing about, you don't agree with it at all? You see what made them describe it that way, but all the value judgements they made, which is what made the thing seem interesting (or not) in the first place, were off. You can't really write an interesting piece about music without being at least a litte bit subjective, and thus less informative to the reader.