Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation

  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: (kaniini@pleroma.site)'s status on Thursday, 11-Jul-2019 07:46:20 EDT :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy:

    “Tusky violates the GPLv3 because of the anti-tivo clause” is the worst take yet

    In conversation Thursday, 11-Jul-2019 07:46:20 EDT from pleroma.site permalink
    1. flussence 🦖️‍🍍️🔵 (flussence@nulled.red)'s status on Thursday, 11-Jul-2019 14:47:49 EDT flussence 🦖️‍🍍️🔵 flussence 🦖️‍🍍️🔵
      in reply to

      @kaniini “Tusky violates the GPLv3 because my interpretation of it is more valid than RMS's” is possibly the most nuclear fossbro bullshit take in existence

      In conversation Thursday, 11-Jul-2019 14:47:49 EDT from nulled.red permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.