@schaueho @mdallastella I don't like the article much. As you mentioned he he doesn't touch on the things that make Lisp great. He also brings up an example that is very terse, but really, if terseness was everything then we'd all be programming APL. And I like APL.
It somehow feels to me that the only reason the author prefers Clojure over Common Lisp is because the function names are shorter in Clojure.