M. Grégoire@JordiGH @eightbitsamurai
Here's the argument I make:
The law forbids certain people from wearing religious symbols in the exercise of their functions. That forbids, for instance, an Orthodox Jewish man from wearing a kippah as a teacher. On the other hand, a non-religious teacher would be permitted to wear a kippah as a personal fashion choice.
What is the logic that permits an act for frivolous reasons, but forbids that same act for reasons of conscience?
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the