Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. neil πŸ„ (neil@social.coop)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jul-2019 06:20:41 EDT neil 🍄 neil πŸ„

    Been thinking lately that it could be a good municipal function to provide people with access to an 'online home', analogous to ensuring provision of physical homes.

    In the same way it could be social, affordable, in a co-op, heck even (hopefully not) private/rented. The municipality provides some infrastructure and regulations to make sure there's a home for everyone, but equally you can build your own home or move into an intentional community if you want, and have the wherewithal to do so.

    In conversation Sunday, 28-Jul-2019 06:20:41 EDT from social.coop permalink
    1. neil πŸ„ (neil@social.coop)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jul-2019 06:21:57 EDT neil 🍄 neil πŸ„
      in reply to

      Not talking about a StateBook - if the state has any function in it, I think it should be regulating for open protocols and standards, or even just bare minimum access to data and data portability (https://newsocialist.org.uk/do-we-really-need-a-statebook/).

      I'm thinking more like Indienet - (https://indienet.info/) - the project in Ghent (coordinated by @aral) to provide each denizen with their own connected node in a wider p2p/federated network.

      In conversation Sunday, 28-Jul-2019 06:21:57 EDT from social.coop permalink

      Attachments

      1. Invalid filename.
        Do we really need a StateBook?
        from New Socialist
        by Irina Bolychevsky, James Moulding // Corbyn’s digital speech is a good start, but we should look to redecentralise the web rather than build new social media monopolies.
      1. neil πŸ„ (neil@social.coop)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jul-2019 06:22:37 EDT neil 🍄 neil πŸ„
        in reply to

        I mean municipal more in the sense of libertarian municipalism, self-determination and federation of villages, towns, cities.

        Obviously access to physical housing is a mess, at least where I'm currently living, so maybe not the best reference point. But I'm finding it an interesting framing.

        Every Facebook or Twitter profile is currently a home on the web, and it's as if billions of people all have the same corrupt landlord.

        In conversation Sunday, 28-Jul-2019 06:22:37 EDT from social.coop permalink
        1. neil πŸ„ (neil@social.coop)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jul-2019 06:29:34 EDT neil 🍄 neil πŸ„
          in reply to

          This is kind of implicitly assuming that everyone *needs* a home on the web. That is certainly a debatable point. It is definitely becoming more of a part of the fabric of everyday life, and you could argue that it shouldn't be.

          I vacillate on this a bit but overall I tend to think that the benefits can outweigh the negatives, once it has a social motive and not a profit motive.

          In conversation Sunday, 28-Jul-2019 06:29:34 EDT from social.coop permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.