can you explain in your own words what led you to believe the propaganda lie that lax permissive licenses are not free software licenses? you seem to draw a lot of incorrect conclusions from that false premise, attributing to the promoters of that propaganda lie a lot of what was already present in the movement they forked

your denouncement of power of copyright holders, that you mistake for owners, is misguided on at least two accounts: (i) GPLv3 has provisions for projects to appoint a trustworthy proxy to approve later versions, and your failure to mention that is either dishonest or poorly-informed, and neither supports the false notion you attempt to denounce; (ii) the power to enforce respect for freedom is the opposite of ownership, it only resembles ownership from the POV of someone who is attempting to avail oneself of unjust ownership rights. copyleft only imposes restrictions on those who would otherwise impose restrictions on others