Conversation

Notices

1. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Friday, 05-Aug-2022 07:03:27 EDT lnxw48a1
   https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/04/gitlab_data_retention_policy/ [www theregister com]
   
   #GitLab finding that storage costs for dormant "free" repos is a problem.
   
   https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/05/gitlab_reverses_deletion_policy/
   
   But after leaked deletion plans sparked uproar, the company backed off its plan to delete "dormant" repos.
   1. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Friday, 05-Aug-2022 08:53:18 EDT lnxw48a1

      in reply to
      I'm starting to wonder whether operating a shared #code-hosting platform is only possible with sponsorship. #Gitorious collapsed because their paid hosting couldn't cover their costs (which includes the cost of free hosting). I don't believe #Github ever publicly released figures, but I do remember hearing a rumor that they were not profitable before #Microsoft purchased them. #Bitbucket still persists, but #Atlassian has made so many changes to their offerings that IMO, using their platform is putting everything that touches it at risk. #SourceForge went to all sorts of dangerous extremes to try to monetize the huge number of repositories they host (most of which appear to be residue of projects that have either died or moved their active repos elsewhere).
      
      #Darcs_Hub ( #Darcs ), #The_Nest ( #Pijul ), and #ChiselApp ( #Fossil ) are all too small to experience the tremendous cost factors.