I found this link via @geniusmusing https://nu.federati.net/url/287486 [www techdirt com]

In regard to the #Twitter vs #Musk legal action, Musk's claims about spam are irrelevant.

> Either way, note that the supposed breach of this clause (which again, does not appear to have actually been breached) is what the attempted termination, and thus the lawsuit, is actually about. Musk has to show that he requested information that was necessary for completing the deal and that Twitter didn’t give it to him.

> Twitter just has to show that (1) it gave him what he asked for and (2) anything it didn’t give him either didn’t exist or in Twitter’s estimation was either not necessary for consummating the deal or could be abused by Musk.

> Note that “how much spam is on the platform” doesn’t even remotely play into any of this.