Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. simsa04 (simsa04@gnusocial.net)'s status on Friday, 02-Sep-2022 19:14:05 EDT simsa04 simsa04
    Jonah Messinger, Seaver Wang & Adam Stein, "The Faulty Diablo Canyon Study that Started it All" https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/the-faulty-diablo-canyon-study-that-started-it-all

    Governor Gavin Newsom proposed to provide a $1.4 billion loan to PG&E to restart relicensing and preparations for continued operation of Diablo Canyon. As the main studies (and false modelling) on which the shut-down of Diablo Canyon had been based were authored by "Friends of the Earth" and "Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies", lawmakers should consider to hold both NGOs accountable and fine them to reimburse the taxpayer for the loan.

    #energy #nuclear
    In conversation Friday, 02-Sep-2022 19:14:05 EDT from gnusocial.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. The Faulty Diablo Canyon Study that Started it All
      from The Breakthrough Institute
      With the California Legislature currently debating Governor Gavin Newsom’s proposal to keep Diablo open, a reckoning of how CEERT concluded that it was cheaper to close Diablo, how its flawed analysis came to be accepted by PG&E, the California Public Utility Commission, and the California…
    1. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Saturday, 03-Sep-2022 00:59:49 EDT lnxw48a1 lnxw48a1
      in reply to
      > CEERT projected future annual capital costs for DCPP operations based, in part, on one time capital expenditures, such as new steam generators and reactor pressure vessel heads, made by PG&E ahead of its anticipated license renewal to keep Diablo Canyon open. These sunk capital investments, which will be stranded should Diablo close as currently planned, would have been amortized over the planned license extension period of twenty years. Instead, CEERT replicated them as annual capital expenditures.

      Okay, that kind of thing should have been caught. Surely there's ONE person in the state's regulatory hierarchy who took a first semester accounting class.

      Also, that kind of error says that either CEERT is so incompetent that they should never have been allowed to do the study in the first place, or they are intentionally deceptive and manipulative.

      You're right. There should be fiscal consequences to the sponsoring organizations.
      In conversation Saturday, 03-Sep-2022 00:59:49 EDT from nu.federati.net permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.