Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Bob Mottram (bob@social.freedombone.net)'s status on Tuesday, 07-Nov-2017 06:41:23 EST Bob Mottram Bob Mottram
    GPL version numbers https://opensource.com/article/17/11/avoiding-gpl-confusion
    In conversation Tuesday, 07-Nov-2017 06:41:23 EST from social.freedombone.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. Invalid filename.
      Shedding light on foggy GPL licenses
      from Opensource.com
      Clarity is key to avoid licensing ambiguity.
    1. Annah (maiyannah@community.highlandarrow.com)'s status on Tuesday, 07-Nov-2017 07:54:05 EST Annah Annah
      in reply to
      @bob 
      "For example, assume that an application's license states: "This program is licensed under the GPL," and includes a copy of the GPL v3 license in its entirety. Because the project did not explicitly communicate which version number of the license applies, a reasonable interpretation would be that any and all versions of the GPL published by the Free Software Foundation may apply—v3, v2, or even v1!"

      This would not constitute a reasonable belief.  If the version is not specified then it would be assumed in a court of law that the version included with the application is the one which governs.
      In conversation Tuesday, 07-Nov-2017 07:54:05 EST from community.highlandarrow.com permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.