Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. fortune (fortune@social.heldscal.la)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Sep-2017 17:10:01 EDT fortune fortune
    The big problem with pornography is defining it. You can't just
    say it's pictures of people naked. For example, you have these
    primitive African tribes that exist by chasing the wildebeest on foot,
    and they have to go around largely naked, because, as the old tribal
    saying goes: "N'wam k'honi soit qui mali," which means, "If you think
    you can catch a wildebeest in this climate and wear clothes at the same
    time, then I have some beach front property in the desert region of
    Northern Mali that you may be interested in."
    So it's not considered pornographic when National Geographic
    publishes color photographs of these people hunting the wildebeest
    naked, or pounding one rock onto another rock for some primitive reason
    naked, or whatever. But if National Geographic were to publish an
    article entitled "The Girls of the California Junior College System
    Hunt the Wildebeest Naked," some people would call it pornography. But
    others would not. And still others, such as the Spectacularly Rev.
    Jerry Falwell, would get upset about seeing the wildebeest naked.
    -- Dave Barry, "Pornography"
    In conversation Tuesday, 12-Sep-2017 17:10:01 EDT from social.heldscal.la permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.