Notices tagged with jitsi, page 3

@dyamon
> i don't seem to be able to fully understand what #jitsi #videobridge is.

Here's how I understand it. A #WebRTC server performs the initial introductions between peers who want to chat, then gets out of the way and lets them chat peer-to-peer. But if it's a video chat, between 3 or more peers, that's a lot of video streams being sent by each peer to all the others. So #VideoBridge relays the video stream sent by each peer to all the other peers.

(Feel free to correct me on this!)

Sad day. Today i failed.

A customer pushed my boss to use #skype for a meeting.

I showed him #Jitsi: no installation, no accounts, just a link to share, same features (we will use it just for desktop sharing, calls will be via phone because we don't have microphones/headphones/speakerphone connected to pc).

This morning he made me create a skype account and share with the customer.

Damn.

@clacke group chat is all #JitsiMeet does. The voice/ video uses #WebRTC and their own #VideoBridge software. It's a totally separate thing from the #Jitsi #XMPP client. AFAIK it doesn't support XMPP and if it supports #SIP that's news to me.
@xj9

@forktogether
>This is currently the most accessible option for now

what does make matrix or other #webRTC like #jitsi less accessible?
Is that caused by the design of the software or simply because those that are part of the fork use #discord instead of something else?

@clar @Satsuma

@maloki
here's the first feedback:
I wouldn't want to join just for the reason of not using proprietary software when their is an alternative.
#jitsi works great, same does #matrix
@Loa