Notices by Charbax (charbax@noagendasocial.com), page 6

@Azotad @Meachamus_Prime there's a Billion people living in Africa. Half a billion people living in the middle east. A Billion and a half people living in India. All those places need a friggen 100% solar power. There's also a billion people living from southern USA all the way down below the sunniest parts of giant Brazil, not building 1000x more solar all over those places is COMPLETELY DUMB. Exxon Mobil and Shell hate that idea.

@Azotad @Meachamus_Prime also Denmark reaches to a majority of its electrical consumption through wind yet Denmark has only very few electric cars yet on its roads, the electric car batteries are the perfect combination with wind to eveb out periods with less wind or to provide for peak power requirements by building a network of electric cars and a smart grid together with more wind. It's a friggen no brainer and people who trash talk AOC are either corrupt or don't want to have a clue.

@Azotad @Meachamus_Prime doing what Denmark did is something that can be done 100x to 1000x more than it is done yet on a global scale!! I don't care if every place is not suitable fot wind! 100x to 1000x more places are 10000% suitable right now! There is zero argument for not doing 100x more wind power than humanity is doing today.

@Azotad @Meachamus_Prime modern solar installations last for more than 50 years with little to no maintenance. In fact solar even in a country like Austria is 5x cheaper than coal or oil so no, there is zero valid argument against solar today, even in Austria. Governments must provide all the long term loans to make this happen right now. Anything that obviously pays for itself in a decade is a no brainer for any Government.

@Azotad @Meachamus_Prime if solar power pays for itself after 10-15 years on when installed on roofs in Switzerland and Austria, it's still worth it, it's still a no brainer. Sure that's not as efficient as sunnier countries where solar pays for itself in 5-7 years, still even 10-15 years is a no brainer and Switzerland and Austria should be doing 10x to 100x more solar than they are doing now.

@Azotad @Meachamus_Prime and Nuclear would be a total disaster for Switzerland and Austria, if it was to meltdown, it could wipe out the whole country, think the disaster if half of Switzerland or Austria became totally inhabitable forever overnight. Why risk it with Nuclear when there are green alternatives like Hydro, Thermal, even Solar can work in Switzerland and Austria too. Sure half as efficient as solar in the south of France or in North Africa or in the middle east, still effective.

@Azotad @Meachamus_Prime hydro power is just fine for Switzerland and Austria for example, thermal probably could work there too. Something like 80% of the earth's surface is water, I am not suggesting we put wind power everywhere, but for sure we could be implementing 100x more wind power than we are implementing on a global scale today. Same thing for solar, I don't suggest solar is the solution for Norwary, I suggest all of the sunny countries that have huge deserts need to use it massively!

@Meachamus_Prime @Azotad in Denmark where I live, we have the worlds most wind energy per habitant, there are windy periods where wind power provides over 100% of our electricity consumption, sometimes we export wind energy to Sweden and Germany, the giant Danish Wind installations at sea all around Denmark have all paid for themselves years ago and this means out electricity now thanks to Wind energy)
is cheaper than any other country. There is no good reason every other country doesn't do it

@Azotad @Meachamus_Prime not having installed 1000x more solar power capacity in places like the deserts, in all the crazy hot sunny 95% of the year kind of places, sure solar panels on rooftops why not, but the priority of course should be to install huge solar power plants where there is a lot of sun for most of the year. It's like nuclear you don't create tiny nuclear reactors in every home, you create a huge nuclear reactor somewhere and you transfer the power to whole cities not so far.

@Meachamus_Prime @Azotad I've spoke with all the wind experts they say the giant wind turbine system that you install at sea or in other large windy areas they pay for themselves within 5 years at non subsidized coal energy prices, some can run for decades with little to no maintenance required, the big wind turbines are totally unaffected by any bird.

@Meachamus_Prime @Azotad there are about a billion more times bird killed in traffic and banging against buildings the eind is not a significant problem and there are eays to scare the birds away. Solar and wind can pay for itself within 5 years of being installed, at coal prices, that meand solar and wind energy is basically free 5-10 years after it's installed. Maxxing out wind and solar installations everywhere that those makes sense economically is a no brainer. The Government needs to do it

@Azotad clean energy id cheaper than oil, gas and coal right now. The conspiracy is oil companies are spreading lies about its cost and they desperately fight all attempts at building more clean energy. Oil, gas and coal is a multi trillion dollar racket they want to continue.

@bob if someone can prove they can make 100% safe nuclear power on like some kind of island hundreds of miles away from habitations and somehow transfer all that power safely over the sea or something, then sure go ahead. I am no electricity expert but I am quite sure such thing is not safe and not possible. A nuclear power plant meltdown means hundreds of miles suddenly become inhabitable forever and the contamination cannot be stopped. Millions of cancers were caused by Tchernobyl disaster.

Being against more solar and wind is just so wrong. Solar is about much cleaner and more efficient that oil, gas and coal, same for wind. Not wanting to use the "free energy" from solar and wind is a campaign by the Trillion dollar oil, gas and coal industry. Think about it. They desperately are afraid to lose their monopoly on energy production and distribution, think about it.

French nuclear plants are 40+ years old, they're all on the verge of collapsing. France has come near nuclear catastrophy several times with their nuclear plants over the past 60 years, and nuclear plants are insane targets for any terrorist attack could render a whole region of France (and countries around France) inhabitanle forever.

@Meachamus_Prime there is no trade deficit if you include financial services which is the main bread and butter of the UK. With Brexit the UK has completely destroyed their main business, all of the banks are moving out of London and moving to Frankfurt or to Paris instead. There is absolutely no point in the EU allowing the UK to keep its financial services business if they go through with Brexit. And if you think the EU would allow the UK to become a tax heaven likr Singapore think it over.

And 85% of UK exports goes to or through the EU. While the average EU country barely has 5% of its exports going to the UK. Why the heck should the EU ever care to help the UK out with it's insane independence initiative? It's a giant own goal, it's a self inflicted wound. All major industry has already moved out of the UK since Brexit or they are all seriously contemplating to leave if the UK is stupid enough to really go through with Brexit. London city's banking sector can move out overnight.

UK has lost Trillions of $ since Brexit. The £ has de-valued 30% against both the $ and against the € since the Brexit vote. Also check up Trillions of £ have been transferred out of the UK economy and out of UK banks since the Brexit vote. Suggesting Brexit would be good for the UK is wrong. And it's never going to happen anyway, haha. Putin/Trump/China and the EU they are all laughing at the UK's complete stupidity. They're all profiting Trillions of dollars straight out of the UK.

@js290 @bigl0af One thingss for sure the zUS and the EU love Brexit, over a trillion £ of wealth has transferred to them out of the UK since the Brexit vote. And they're laughing if UK goes through with No Deal it'll be another 10 trillion £ transfered out of the UK economy and into the EU and US economy. No wonder Trump loves Brexit he makes hundreds of millions of $ thanks to Brexit.

@bigl0af I bet 69000 are US and Russian bots or perhaps there just is 70K dumb people in the UK. No deal means UK economy would go completely down the toilet. They already lost 35% on the value of the £ (everybody in the UK is 35% poorer) since the referendum.