hosh (hosh@hub.vikshepa.com)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Oct-2018 12:34:32 EDT
hoshI'm thinking that I don't really care any more about what happens to any of these big companies and their ambitions. As long as there are excellent free open source products and services like Gnu Linux, Hubzilla, Calibre, and all the other thousands of applications in the repositories, I feel like my needs are well provided for. Thanks to the enormous efforts of so many people we finally have software, services and an internet that is wonderful and amazing. We don't need to worry about the corporate fortunes of Google and Facebook. We are independent and free.
Google Plus was a beautiful piece of technology; it's just that Google's commercial and competitive motivation in making it was so transparent. That was the only reason to dislike the product, but it was a big one.
Opera was quite a nice company during the era that it had myopera and stopped being a nice company after they abandoned it. That was also a very well crafted product. I quite liked myopera, but never really trusted it to continue.
But wow; you can't really trust Google with any of its products. S-o m-a-n-y disappointments. Good services and products just abandoned.
It's interesting that Tumblr's still around, despite being passed around between different companies.
hosh (hosh@hub.vikshepa.com)'s status on Wednesday, 03-Oct-2018 08:10:33 EDT
hosh"The ruling elites of the United States and Europe, who so energetically and shamelessly publicized their political system to win the support of the peoples of Eastern Europe, are now stealthily getting rid of that same system." Contemporary capitalism requires adequate legal scaffolding, both national as an international, and arbitrators who rule on disputes between companies and on property rights, but in reality it does not need a democratic structure, except as a showcase, for how long our leaders will take the trouble to preserve the forms of democracy, while they empty it of any real content is the argument of a serious debate. "
Well, thanks to you I just read the article on him in Wikipedia. Fascinating - an all around renaissance man!
hosh (hosh@hub.vikshepa.com)'s status on Sunday, 30-Sep-2018 09:55:15 EDT
hoshYou've really got to know a language or its rudiments if you want to claim to have read its books. That's how I feel when I approach Lao Tzu, or Rumi or Sarmad. I know enough basic Sanskrit to at least feel more comfortable when I read translations of the Upanishads or the Gita. I wish I knew Chinese, Persian, Arabic, Urdu... It's not impossible. But it requires a bit of effort.
hosh (hosh@hub.vikshepa.com)'s status on Sunday, 30-Sep-2018 09:42:57 EDT
hoshI've added a translation of Lao Tzu to the books section of my files. This is a translation by Lin Yutang. I don't know its providence, but it seems to me to be the most reliable one that I was able to find in the torrents. (I compared it to versions of Gia Fu Feng and Jane English, Bart, James Legge and a couple of others from the same torrent and the version by Ursula Le Guin which I have in Kindle.) The one that I had in my teenage years was just the Penguin edition, which I liked a lot - I still remember some of the verses by heart.