@rysiek You can refer to it as XMPP 2018 or something :-). > Even a tech-savvy user and clearly an expert in XMPP you cannot link to a compliance checker. I also don't find it needed for clients (and for servers https://conversations.im/compliance is quite enough): Gajim on desktop, Conversations on Android. The list is not that big, Psi seems to be catching up but, so far, here we are. P.S. @maiyannah made a reply but it seems to not have federated through to you.
> both the most compliant servers, and the ones that are almost not compliant with anything, can all claim to be supporting or implementing XMPP. @rysiek It's like with HTML: even a page made in 1997 can claim to support HTML, yet HTML5… not so much. I didn't give a link to any checker that checks specifically for what the XMPP Compliance Suites XEP requires (I'm not aware of any) but, the ones that I gave, overlap with it considerably, and in a user-centric way as XEP-0387 also takes into account bots and all that.
@vantablack From my perspective, that is exactly what the difference between "left-wing" and "right-wing" are: individual securities and society at large respectively. So I don't see those as buzzwords, more like really basic ideas that can be shaped one way or the other depending on how priorities are shaped in every edge-case, mixing them together, kind of.
@acuteanniemay I'd also mention for clarity that a developer that uses some library or framework not written by that developer is the user in this equation.
@schestowitz Surely one can see having "twitter" and "facebook" in lyrics is the way to make songs timeless. "Come on, girl, chat with me on AOL instant messenger, I have it opened in Netscape just for you" :-).