Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Thursday, 26-Sep-2024 18:33:41 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)e você tem a mensagens num só dispositivo e não fizer backup da conta, perde tudo, inclusive a conta e fizer backup da conta, pode ativá-la noutro dipositivo, aí o jami vai buscar os contatos na rede, e as mensagens nos contatos agora o que eu sugeria além disso, que o Jami (ainda?) não faz: - backup via rede, automático e cifrado, dos seus dados em contatos que você escolhe, se os contatos aceitarem - backup de partes da chave usada para cifrar os backups junto a (outros?) contatos escolhidos por você, usando uma técnica que permite recuperar a chave e os dados tendo acesso a M fragmentos quaisquer de um total de N contatos que tenham recebido fragmentos. tipo Erasure Coding, só que reforçado para criptografia, funcionando como cofres com 3 fechaduras, que abrem com 2 chaves quaisquer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_sharing
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Thursday, 26-Sep-2024 18:01:48 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)oh, drew, won't you ever cut the bs? you take an "I was wrong, children need to be protected, but teens are not children" and leap from that to "teens don't need any protection whatsoever", which does not follow at all. that's what my daughter calls neurotypism: making guesses about what's going on in a neurodivergent's mind as if the person were neurotypical. our minds are different and diverse even among ourselves, but you can't get that into your mind AFAICT because it would conflict with your determination to condemn an innocent person. teens are not children, but they aren't adults either. their development requires progressive autonomy. your stance that they should have no say whatsoever as to their sexual development and experiences, because you say so and set out to destroy that who says otherwise, is the problem here. teens need increasing amounts of autonomy as they progress towards adulthood for the sake of their own development, and it's your push for infantilizing them is that is harmful. moreover, development is not uniform, chronological ages are reference points but not determinant. there's diversity even there, and even more so among atypical people. your binary stance lacks the tolerance, inclusiveness, thoughtfulness and nuance that you'd see in RMS's speech if only you weren't so blinded by what you project onto him. why do you hate diversity of thought so much?
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Thursday, 26-Sep-2024 15:28:02 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)my (admittedly obscure and misleading, I see now) reference to SC was because it sets the precedent, normalizes, and pushes for this sort of solutionism. governments, whether corrupt or just gullible, have been following along and entrenching the duopoly with solutionism that displaces working and accessible services. it's maddening. when schools started adopting google for ad-ucation tools, it was not because they wanted to make kids dependent for life, it was because google sold them an illusion that it would be great for the students and for the schools. it is a kind of corruption, but it's not necessarily the kind in which the powers that be take a side payment or a luxury trip; it can get honest decision-makers to embrace horrible systems whose downsides only become apparent when it's too late
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Thursday, 26-Sep-2024 15:14:25 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)I'm the kind of neurodivergent who's transparent and thinks of unusual ideas. it's a shame that some people take our ideas without context and turn them into dog whistles for reproachable ideas, and then others assume we, who can't help being transparent, are withholding their horrible thoughts. but I do have a problem with your suggestion that it started on Oct 7th last year. that's difficult to not take as malicious manipulation at this point. you might have called that a dog whistle if you weren't so deep in your own rabbit hole. your presumption of antisemitism is nonsensical: if two humans were fighting, and I set out to hold the one who was beating up the other to death (whether or not I knew how hard the other had hit before), how the heck would that make me antihuman?!?
To publicly acknowledge the fact that an artificial intelligence was used during the writing of a scientific paper, scientists add "et AI" (with AI in Latin) at the end of the list of authors.