@neither@katebowles sorry for infodumping at you. Very tired. Was in seminars all day and now think WALL OF TEXT is acceptable mode of conversation. Oops.
@neither@katebowles Similarly the ubiquity of smartphones or at least feature phones with rudimentary browsers means way more people can participate in online culture than could twenty years ago; but let me tell you, YouTube videos on a featurephone are pretty terrible or even impossible.
@neither@katebowles It's paradoxical, esp with screenreaders, because the average smartphone represents a truly amazing amount of assistive technology compared to... Well, anything that came before.
@neither@katebowles And at least another in how digital cultures that are very graphics-based are less accessible to people with poor connectivity, low bandwidth, or using assistive screenreaders -- so people likely to already be at some disadvantage in society
@neither@katebowles There's probably a dissertation in discussing how tech advances (higher resolution screens, more bandwidth) have influenced a move to a more visual culture
@neither@artsyhonker@katebowles I write music by making dots on paper with a pencil, and I consider this technology. :-) I do subscribe to a service that transcribes my voicemails to text and e-mail, it's great!
@neither@katebowles What didn't exist in 2004 was the expectation that "normal" people would have anything more complicated than e-mail. I was using IRC and MUDding and using LJ, but the majority of people I knew in meatspace didn't use any of this stuff. Now? Only a minority *don't* use the Book of Face.
@neither@katebowles Smartphones were, of course, much less common, and there still isn't a good Dreamwidth phone client which is a shame; but I was reading various blogs (and LJ) and posting from my phone using WAP by about 2007, and I was a late starter with that.