Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Friday, 29-Sep-2017 02:33:01 EDT lnxw48a1 lnxw48a1
    I've been reading more about #Dat ( https://docs.datproject.org/ ) ... I see a hard dependency on #Node.JS, which has lessened my interest quite a bit.
    In conversation Friday, 29-Sep-2017 02:33:01 EDT from nu.federati.net permalink
    1. clacke (clacke@social.heldscal.la)'s status on Friday, 29-Sep-2017 02:59:25 EDT clacke clacke
      in reply to
      @lnxw48a1 It's a very cool project.

      But I am biased, as I have met some of the people involved, and it's sort of SSB-adjacent.
      In conversation Friday, 29-Sep-2017 02:59:25 EDT from social.heldscal.la permalink
      1. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Friday, 29-Sep-2017 03:11:14 EDT lnxw48a1 lnxw48a1
        in reply to
        @clacke Speaking of SSB, what's the relationship with gitmx? http://gitmx.com/
        In conversation Friday, 29-Sep-2017 03:11:14 EDT from nu.federati.net permalink
        1. clacke (clacke@social.heldscal.la)'s status on Friday, 29-Sep-2017 03:24:23 EDT clacke clacke
          in reply to
          @lnxw48a1 Everything around ssb is pretty loose organization-wise. I don't know much about the gitmx people, but I think they're sort of an autonomous fringe.

          http://evbogue.com/decent/ is a social network distinct from Patchwork, but still on top of ssb. I think. There's some deliberate demarcation between networks, but I don't know if that's on the ssb level or the application level.

          The domain name gitmx.com used to be a git-ssb front-end. Seems it isn't anymore.
          In conversation Friday, 29-Sep-2017 03:24:23 EDT from social.heldscal.la permalink
          1. lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Friday, 29-Sep-2017 10:58:52 EDT lnxw48a1 lnxw48a1
            in reply to
            @clacke The whole ssb thing is in my 'try this' queue. I've just had little time + energy + bandwidth recently.
            In conversation Friday, 29-Sep-2017 10:58:52 EDT from nu.federati.net permalink
      2. [Moved] beni@wirebug.ch (beni@mastodon.sdf.org)'s status on Friday, 29-Sep-2017 16:12:46 EDT [Moved] beni@wirebug.ch [Moved] beni@wirebug.ch
        in reply to

        @clacke @lnxw48a1 how does it compare to ipfs - if this question even makes sense.

        In conversation Friday, 29-Sep-2017 16:12:46 EDT from mastodon.sdf.org permalink
      3. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Tuesday, 24-Oct-2017 10:35:29 EDT Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
        in reply to
        Wut? I thought #DigitalAudioTape was a failed technology from the 1990s, and haven't seen references to #SingleSideBand since the #CBRadio days. Or perhaps we ran out of #TLAs in 2010, and we're just recycling the unused ones. @lnxw48a1 @clacke #Dat #SSB
        In conversation Tuesday, 24-Oct-2017 10:35:29 EDT from web permalink
        1. clacke (clacke@social.heldscal.la)'s status on Tuesday, 24-Oct-2017 12:23:08 EDT clacke clacke
          in reply to
          @bobjonkman @lnxw48a1 One of the drawbacks of having experience -- old TLAs coming back to haunt us. :-)

          I actually find #ssb reusing the old radio initialism quite appropriate. The feeling of the decentralized social network is rather HAM-radio-like.
          In conversation Tuesday, 24-Oct-2017 12:23:08 EDT from social.heldscal.la permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.