Notices tagged with proportionalrepresentation
-
Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Saturday, 09-Jul-2022 13:28:44 EDT Bob Jonkman New Zealand
#ProportionalRepresentation -
Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Saturday, 14-May-2022 13:47:32 EDT Bob Jonkman "A Supreme Court that doesn't give a damn what the public wants ... is exactly what a Supreme Court is for, actually."
True enough. But elected representatives in government *are* supposed to do what people want, that's why they get elected. If they had fulfilled their obligations to actually represent the citizens' wants then the Supreme Court wouldn't have to act at all.
It all boils down to a need for #ProportionalRepresentation with multi-member districts so all views are represented in goverment. -
M. Grégoire (mpjgregoire@mastodon.club)'s status on Sunday, 13-Oct-2019 17:31:28 EDT M. Grégoire @keithzg I have strong interest in #ElectoralReform myself -- I strongly oppose #ProportionalRepresentation. (We can discuss that at some point if you'd like, but preferably not today.) But in my experience it's not an issue that moves voters. Hence the low turnout and the status quo wins whenever there is a referendum on the issue.
#PMTrudeau will likely be happy that he the current vote will be under #FPTP. We seem to be heading towards 1972 redux.
-
Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Thursday, 10-Jan-2019 06:40:56 EST Strypey @Wolf480pl yes, sorry for the ambiguity, both #MMP and #STV are forms of #ProportionalRepresentation. In #NZ we use MPP for central government elections, and STV for some local/ regional council elections. Having now voted in both styles of election, and seen the wider political effects (we've had MMP since the 1990s), I think STV is the better system.
-
M. Grégoire (mpjgregoire@mastodon.club)'s status on Wednesday, 21-Nov-2018 11:36:00 EST M. Grégoire Since #proportionalrepresentation does necessarily result in a government that better reflects the public will (its purported advantage), and since it loses the useful features of easily creating and throwing out majority governments, it should be rejected.
Caveat: Governments depend on political culture as much as formal rules; changes to the system ought to be considered in a specific context, not on an a priori basis.
-
M. Grégoire (mpjgregoire@mastodon.club)'s status on Wednesday, 21-Nov-2018 11:00:14 EST M. Grégoire I oppose #proportionalrepresentation .
Proponents claim many advantages, which largely depend on the variant used; I could criticise them one by one. (e.g., PR elects more women! But closed-list PR makes MLAs responsible to their parties not constituents!)
Let me instead address two general problems.
-
Mark A. Gibbs (indi@sn.genesismachina.ca)'s status on Monday, 09-Apr-2018 13:46:12 EDT Mark A. Gibbs I don't think there's a single party that's *ever* held power at the federal or provincial level - in any province - that hasn't promised #ProportionalRepresentation at least in spirit at some point, then changed their mind once in power. -
Bob Jonkman (bobjonkmangreen@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Monday, 09-Apr-2018 12:48:31 EDT Bob Jonkman I think you've identified the problem: lack of representation. Every party except the #ABNDP is under-represented in the legislature, and the ABNDP majority of seats has 100% of the power with only 40% of the votes -- 60% of the population gets no say in what the ABNDP decides to ram through. The #NDP across the country has a policy of implementing #ProportionalRepresentation, but every time they get in power they break that election promise.