@leo No, I have no interest in curating a community. I’d love to see federation/decentralisation at the scale of one. Where the community becomes the social graph between the instances :) + @aral@Gargron
Hmm, doesn’t look like my personal instance is entirely working (seeing log output on follow requests, etc., but the interface is empty). Will look into it.
When/if you can, I would highly urge you to set up your own Mastodon instance. Currently requires tech knowledge/isn’t seamless (and getting it there will be a big challenge) but this is a great start and a very good step in the right direction.
@Gargron You are a gem. Thank you so much. I'll update the sample apps/docs in Set to use it and then write something up to try and spread the word to tutorial writers/trainers/etc.
(Hello from a slightly less early 6AM start in Sofia) :)
@ZackF (cont.) I wonder if “healthy” (e.g., does not addict, etc.) should be included in the list of attributes that an ethically-designed product should have under the human rights section or whether it needs to be broken down into more specific/explicit aspects to be of more practical use and possibly split between the rights/effort/perhaps even experience sections (e.g., “non-addictive” spans all three).
@ZackF Hey Zack, thanks. Interesting point on health: my initial thought is that health-related considerations are covered by the respect for human rights and human effort categories – can you think of any examples where this isn't the case? Would you see respect for health as a separate causal category that doesn't overlap the others or would you see being healthy/not unhealthy as a cross-cutting symptom of an ethically-designed product?
(Twitter and Facebook have users – the term used by Silicon Valley and drug dealers to describe the people they addict to their products and exploit. We have *people* / members.) :)
@aral I've defined about 50% of it in an OpenAPI v2 definition, and I'm able to generate a Swift and Node.js API for it, so both should be done in about a week.