@Dekken Computers keep teaching me its faster to just go with my gut or heuristics and then only complicate things later down the line, but I keep not learning my lesson. lol
@Dekken Yep. Honestly when I saw the socket line, I was like, "Hm.. The path specification here seems to look like a relative path by linux standards, within which the socket file doesn't exist. But since I'm dealing with servers and symbolic links are a thing and so on, who knows." I should've just gone with my instinct from the get-go instead of second-guessing. This would've been solved much earlier.
Got PHP7.0 working... It was actually a simple path mistake causing all my problems. I guessed this was it at first but didn't want to take my chances given I was using the default fastcgi/php settings in the NGINX server block.
Bob Mottram π§ β β (bob@soc.freedombone.net)'s status on Friday, 02-Feb-2018 13:14:21 EST
Bob Mottram π§ β β On the hope of regulating technology companies into not being evil, or being a bit less evil. Evil lite. I don't think this is going to work unless by regulation they mean the rigorous application of anti-monopoly laws. Just levying fines or talking in a stern manner isn't going to cut it, because that's happened to Microsoft and Google in Europe previously, with no subsequent behavior change.
I think a much better strategy than trying to regulate international megacorporations is to invest in democratic control of information infrastructure. Municipal mesh, funding Free Software development and things similar to that. If you're going to regulate then do things like switching IT funding for schools and publicly run organizations from Microsoft and Google software licenses to FOSS and FOSS-based maintenance. Zero percent of public money should be going to the usual monopolists.
@dax But yeah. I'm lucky in that other people don't consult me regarding computer probs at least. It's funny on a metacognitive level when I'm struggling with something computer-related but that's theoretically simple though, 'cuz it manages to break their illusions. lol
It's a good thing I don't actually have to buy too many books this Semester--hopefully--because I can just get the ones my professors put on reserve at the school library and photocopy the relevant material.
@Monochrome@rizele The influence of Puritanism on those things are a lot easier to trace than with aesthetics, which might actually make this an interesting topic to look into. I should probably look for a book called "History of American Aesthetics" or hope someone makes one.
@rizele@Monochrome I wonder where this comes from. Yeah, we can be like, "oh, American pragmatist ideology that's skewed towards efficiency, and that's also in harmony with capitalism." But that seems too easy, and there are many things we do inefficiently despite (or even ironically because of) that ideology. Should I go ahead and trace it all the way back to Puritan aesthetics?