Show Navigation
Notices by Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)
-
this account has moved, and its instance is going to self destruct in less than a week
if you'd like to keep in touch, I'm at @lxo now
happy holidays!
-
this account has moved to @lxo
this one won't be visible any more after the end of the year
see you on the other side? :-)
-
nossa, recebi notificação por email da sua mensagem, fiquei procurando na conta nova e não achei, só agora que vi que foi pra conta velha (que vai fechar no fim do ano)
no GNU social, software de rede social que roda nos servidores que uso, o botão de responder tem esse efeito: não marca ninguém, a mensagem só vai pra quem me acompanha, pra quem tinha mandado a mensagem à qual respondi e (se entendo direito) pra quem iniciou a conversa
na versão que roda no gnusocial.jp, tem um outro botão, que me parece análogo ao "responder para todos" do email, que marca todo mundo que participou da conversa explicitamente.
imagino que outras interfaces façam diferente. não sei, minha experiência é só com GNU social mesmo.
a pergunta é só por curiosidade, ou essa diferença de comportamento causa alguma dificuldade ou incômodo pra você?
-
nossa, recebi notificação por email da sua mensagem, fiquei procurando na conta nova e não achei, só agora que vi que foi pra conta velha (que vai fechar no fim do ano)
no GNU social, software de rede social que roda nos servidores que uso, o botão de responder tem esse efeito: não marca ninguém, a mensagem só vai pra quem me acompanha, pra quem tinha mandado a mensagem à qual respondi e (se entendo direito) pra quem iniciou a conversa
na versão que roda no gnusocial.jp, tem um outro botão, que me parece análogo ao "responder para todos" do email, que marca todo mundo que participou da conversa explicitamente.
imagino que outras interfaces façam diferente. não sei, minha experiência é só com GNU social mesmo.
a pergunta é só por curiosidade, ou essa diferença de comportamento causa alguma dificuldade ou incômodo pra você?
-
é hoje, né?
-
o ônibus pode andar na mesma rua em que andam os carros, não precisa ser pista exclusiva
-
eu sou a favor de demonizar o que faz estrago
parece-me insano não fazê-lo
-
we probably read the same book indeed, but I read it under the light of what I learned from varoufakis about the nature of feudalism that has become dominant in technofeudalism. I've observed that in various ways it was already there. it's not that lenin called it feudalism, he called it monopolies, imperialism, but the key aspect of feudalism (according to my understanding of what I heard varoufakis say in a few speeches and interviews; I'm yet to read the book about it) were clearly (to me) dominating and swallowing the notion of rent-free capitalism that adam smith and his peers wrote about and defended. there's certainly some autistic separation of concepts going on here, but I'm growing convinced that this separation is useful for historical-materialism analysis of past and present, even more so because I keep finding more and more of those key concepts in the literature, though often using different terms. (but I'm not very much bound by terms; I don't read these things in all languages I speak, so I invariably come up with my own translations, and they don't match the official translations in the literature. people often make the mistake of assuming that this means I don't grasp the concepts, or even that I haven't read; words, as surface representations, are more fluid in my mind, concepts are the harder core)
-
... understanding the opposition between big capital (feudal lords) and small enterpreneurs (capitalist-wannabe proletariat), and how big capital exploits and seduces small enterpreneurs with a dream that's about as unachievable for them as it is for any other members of the worker class, was an insight that I was missing before, and this way of looking at big capital as a chimera of feudal lords with the prototypical top-hatted capitalists helped me see and understand some historical and economic processes that seemed a little off to be before it. now, it's clear to me that the literature covers that and understand that, much better than I do, so to me in the end it was sort of a matter of nomenclature, of rearranging my mental symbols to match the language that others use, while I phase out my own old even more limited understandings and conceptual framework. but what if this notion turns out to be useful to others? highlighting the rent-seeking behaviors that varoufakis drew my attention to, that have been present since the inception of capitalism, at first as something that scholars were very critical to, but that later came to be perceived as part of capitalism, seems far more of a break and fundamental corruption of capitalism than ML literature seems to give it credit for, even if only as an idealized mental model. disagree as you wish, but it works for me; I'll probably have to write a book about it some day ;-)
-
I've just read it, and it was reading it that I sort of confirmed my theory, as more and more facts I wasn't aware of that he pointed out fit it perfectly. but it's not like a significant change in doctrine, it's just a different way of understanding big capital: it has *always* been feudal, in the sense that it doesn't really produce anything, it's just rent extraction in disguise. capitalism was born and defended on rent-free grounds, but it had the seeds for regrowth of feudalism at its very top from the beginning, because the prototypical big capitalists, those who only invest and extract and reinvest capital (contrasting with the small capitalists, that need to work in their own small businesses and get exploited by the big ones about as much as other workers) are essentially feudal lords in at least some aspects of their power and rent extraction.
so I've come to the conclusion that feudalism fought back and swallowed capitalism, and lenin describes how that happened for the first time. now I need to study later history to understand how anti-trust law and regulations came to be and to restore some competition for a few decades after WWII, but then feudalism swallowed capitalism all over again. I'm not sure whether it's cyclic (it could be one of the economic cycles that marx wrote about), or a structure that feudal lords could consider retaining indefinitely like soldier boots on our faces forever, but... (TBC)
-
desculpa, @leandroramos, tô vendo aqui meu pôste e achando que pode ter chegado aí parecendo que era dirigido pra você, mas eu tava compondo e compartilhando a minha resposta pra geral, tá?
-
but, captain :-)
-
oh, no, sorry, I was unclear. I just meant that it has been taking me so long to set up my own instance that I'm not confident I'd be ready in time, so I am moving to a new third-party instance instead of rushing it
-
I've long entertained the notion of running my own instance, but I've been too slow to set it up, and I don't wish to wait till the last minute :-(
-
this instance is shutting down
-
this account is moving to @lxo
moving between instances is generally manual, so if you wish to keep on seeing my posts, please follow me there.
esta conta está de mudança para @lxo
mudança entre instâncias é geralmente um processo manual, então, se quiser continuar vendo meus pôstes, por favor me siga lá.
esta dirección se está moviendo a @lxo
el cambio de instancias es generalmente un proceso manual, así que si deseas seguir leyendo mis posts, por favor sígueme allá
-
thank to elbinario.net for having me, and to @administrator for keeping the server running despite my many unintentional attempts to bring it down :-)
-
feliz dia do saci!
-
obrigado por compartilhar
agradecimentos também ao pessoal que faz mpv e yt-dlp, porque aí eu consigo acessar pérolas como essa no estragãm
-
> Corporate contexts often _require_ certain features to be proprietary, unfortunately
wherever that happens, it's because of corruption, not any reasonable preference. no one in one's right mind goes about demanding others to deprive one of autonomy and control over oneself. demands for proprietary features thus like follow from feature provider's influence on regulations to favor the provider's business, at the expense of others who become mandated to submit to the provider's control over their own business.
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the