it's not that I don't. it's that israel is murdering palestinian human beings even faster than the nazi did jewish human beings. I find that intolerable and inexcusable. it makes me sick down to the soul, and though there's nothing I can do to change the course of the WWII holocaust at this point, there is a little (too little, alas) I can do to change the course of the present ongoing holocaust, and finding excuses for it to pass as tolerable is not one of them.
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Friday, 29-Dec-2023 03:44:24 EST
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)I'm lost as to what point you're trying to make here, I'm afraid. it sounds like you're trying to justify the bombing and murdering of palestinians because ancestors of jewish people were oppressed before. this might make some twisted sense if they had been oppressed by ancestors of the palestinians they're now bombing, but there are two major problems there: - that's not the case; the palestinians' ancestors were *also* oppressed back then alongside the jewish semites - if having been previously oppressed (ancestral or not) justified inflicting violence against civilians perceived as belonging to the oppressor group, it would follow that hamas' terrorism against israelis is just as justified as that conducted by the state of israel against palestinians
argh, desculpe pelo link pro youtube, ainda não entendo como isso aconteceu, considerando que comecei com uma playlist no invidious. por favor use mpv pra tocar, ou vá por alguma instância do invidious, pra cair nas garras do monstro youtube
relatable, but somewhat discriminatory against neurodivergents we can hardly ever predict when we're not going to be oversensitive or drained or overwhelmed to the point of being able to sensibly discuss some stressful matter unless "let's try again the same time tomorrow" is an acceptable answer, even if it turns out that, when that time comes, it's not a good time again
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Oct-2023 02:39:55 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)indeed I am, mainly because Unix, ftp and ssh bring it to mind. last I looked, ssh was TCP only, and rsync usually ran over ssh, so I'm confused about how Chaosnet fits in the scenario. > On Lisp Machines .. it figures it out based on the type of machine you are talking to I figured this meant that, when talking to Unix machines, it would use TCP and resort to such things as ftp, ssh, which could be blocked with firewalls just as I pointed out. but the point really was that just probing for how to connect to some remote server, to guess how to talk to it and make such magic work, may trip such paranoid security measures and make further contact impossible. in some high-security environments, it's best to know what services and ports to knock on