Reminder to go to your local library and volunteer to speak on their behalf. Let them know that if folks try to come and ban books that you'll speak publicly against them.
We found out folks were going to be commenting at our library calling for banning books.
So.
We all went and spoke out against them.
Only one person got up and called for a ban. She went first. Everyone after her started calling out her behavior and telling the library staff to keep the books.
The first woman and a couple others soon left before the end of comments.
could you please share the link to the nice speech you have listened to? was that before or after the standing ovations depicted in this video? or is this video (and the other similar ones all over) a deep fake made by Putin to seed dissent among the Westerners? or was the whole thing hallucinated by stochastic parrots? :-)
the revolution will not be televised, but the celebration is expected to be live-streamed starting about 8 hours from now. check out https://www.gnu.org/gnu40/ IIUC times are UTC+2 on that page
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 07:43:17 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)that is reasonable advice. but unfortunately I can't find the speech or other first-hand reports on my own. and then, even first-hand reports may have undisclosed biases and interests. that's why I find "my" dialectic technique to seek truth out of conflicting reports so useful: it is like science, in that it progressively filters out noise and converges on truth, regardless of the motivations behind the noises. I can't control the amount of noise in the random sources that reach me, I can resist only so much the triggers that intentional pieces of propaganda try to inflict on us, but I can learn something by contrasting conflicting reports, if they find their way to me, or if I manage to find them on my own, which is getting harder and harder in the increasingly toxic web
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 06:27:28 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)or maybe you're right, I was misinformed and misled. the reports I read said nothing whatsoever about his even having a chance to speak, and focused on the house speaker's apology for labeling him a hero for having fought in WWII. now I look forward to listening to his speech. I expect he will have denounced and repented his youth's mistakes, and called out the propaganda that drives peoples to invariably unjust and dangerous but very profitable wars. but then, what would the house speaker be apologizing for?!? for having given voice to someone who made a mistake and learned better? please do share your sources instead of arguing from your position of privileged information with others who don't know better. don't assume I've seen all you have, or know all you have. I'm happy to be corrected when I'm wrong, and I thank you for calling out my incorrect assumptions and my mistakes, if that's what they turn out to be. for as long as I only have reports that support each other, I have little reason to doubt them. now I have your conflicting report. it's not enough to establish a different certainty, but it does cast doubt (thanks), and if you can back that up, that's an even stronger case. and if the reports conflict, I can then use my technique to find common ground (and likely truth) out of conflicting reports, so I welcome your links to your sources about the matter. thanks
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 05:32:01 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)I'm not doing that, though I think I can see and believe that you think I am. we are miscommunicating at a level that makes it very hard to overcome. you go back to debating whether or not the alleged former ukranian soldier was or wasn't something, but that *completely* and *deeply* misses the point. my qualm is with the representatives who chose to honor someone as a hero for having taken part in a war. let me show you how fscked up that is with a mix of fictional and real people taking the place of that specific former soldier, to show you how it's not about him
1. this man is a hero, he fought at WWII. (*applause* without even knowing what he fought for or against)
2. this man is a hero, he was born in Austria, he was friends with my grandfather, and they both fought together at WWII (same man as in 1; his name was Adolph)
3. this man is a hero, he was born in Ukraine, and he fought at WWII (is this the canadian man we're talking about? my nazi grandfather? someone else? can't tell; would the parliament honor and applaud them anyway?)
4. this young man is a hero. he was born in ukraine, he dreamed of fighting fascists like his great-grandparents did, and so he jumped at the chance when war knocked on his door: he became a volunteer soldier (*applause* without even knowing what army he joined; note: both sides have soldiers who believe to be fighting fascist enemies)
see what problem I'm getting at? it's not about him at all!
your post, that I responded to, makes IMHO a fundamental strategic mistakes of basing arguments on such capitalism-reinforcing notions as "earning a living" or "people are only worth the value they provide to their capitalist masters". that was what I objected to.
but yeah, we have to be alert to the false promises of techno-utopias as to who will benefit from the promised abundance
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 03:11:50 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)no, sir, I'm not accusing the alleged war veteran of anything. for the third time, my concern has nothing whatsoever to do with him. for all I know, he could have been an actor, and his history entirely invented. the fact I'm worried about is that people in the Canadian congress honored him and treated him as a hero for having allegedly fought against the Russians during WWII. that, meaning, honoring someone for that reason, is what I find profoundly damning and concerning
whereas you are still accusing me while clearly not getting my stance. not cool, man, not cool.
not (just) grub, no. it's a new gnu project, still release candidate, a distribution of boot firmware for motherboards, the stuff that loads the boot loader. the flashable images contain grub though, because it's convenient. https://gnu.org/s/gnuboot https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gnuboot/
you may have heard of GNU Libreboot before. it used to be free software, but it left GNU and then forked things up to embrace, expand and enable binary blobs to take away the freedom from its users. GNU boot is the continuation of what Libreboot should have never ceased to be, and thus the deserving recipient of all the praise and recommendation we used to place on Libreboot back when it deserving of that name, before it became Lie-breboot
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Monday, 25-Sep-2023 14:14:09 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)I meant first victim of a war, alluding specifically to the current conflict between Russia and USNato/Ukraine. whatever facts you bring up from WW2 are AFAIK part of a different war, so the inferences you suggest are not correct. unless you're suggesting the present conflict is still WW2, which I'm not ready to outright reject, but I'd require plenty of evidence to take at face value. are you saying it is the same war, although allies then are now fighting each other, and enemies then are now supporting the same side?
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Monday, 25-Sep-2023 14:06:34 EDT
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)I accept your criticism WRT fact checking. I haven't checked the facts thoroughly. that someone was regarded a hero for voluntarily fighting the forces that ultimately defeated the nazi was evidently damning enough for me. in my reasoning, it's not relevant whether he was or was not a nazi. I'm not judging him. I'm judging those who mistook him for a hero over the allegation that he fought along with the nazi. at least one person has done just that, and I welcome any rationale you can provide in this person's defense. I understand others may have just been misled by him. I wish the "hero" had had the courage to tell them all right then that he didn't deserve that honor, that he was still ashamed of either choosing that side, or of not having resisted the imposition of fighting with that side, whatever it was. but that he was celebrated as a hero for fighting the current enemy back when they were an ally... but wait! oceania has always been at war with eurasia! damn eurasia and its infiltrates and propaganda for confusing us so!