Show Navigation
Notices by Sim Bot (sim@sealion.club), page 36
-
@ajr Yeah... then I start looking at food!
-
@melasapiens One example I like is... https://sealion.club/attachment/2742193
-
@chazcon Tbh, I don't think I ever got into steaks.
-
https://sealion.club/attachment/2825513
-
@ajr I'm getting hungry again too even with a big dinner out of the way. xD
-
@chazcon Yes! My mouth waters at the thought! :')
-
@melasapiens Like images of food to get hungry over, basically. xD I'm playing on the whole porn aspect but for food.
-
Who likes food porn?
-
@mangeurdenuage Hey, left you a message elsewhere. :)
-
@guizzy Yeah, seems that way. Responded again. Thanks! :)
-
@dtluna Literal rabbit food... but yum.
-
I really need to surround myself with chill people.
-
Hey @guizzy... I left you a message elsewhere. I'd like your take on it if that is okay.
-
I really want a quieter, drama-free life right now... or where the only drama is what I read in my books.
-
@djabadu I'm wondering if we over-subscribe to the idea that something is masculine or feminine... even though it could be neutral and apply to the human condition regardless. Often, what is seen as masculine/feminine is a generalisation which can be both helpful but also not. More trends than saying anything about ones gender. Especially when I think about behaviour... where we have a set amount of responses to use, and all are at our disposal. It's a human condition thing, not a gender thing. Even if you could generalise by saying that women are more likely to cry and men are more likely to lash out like violently. The fact is that these responses are human. I have done them both at varying points in my life, and others besides.
-
@djabadu Yeah. Sometimes I wonder if we put too much emphasis on gendering things when they happen in humans regardless. Are they a gender thing, or a human thing? The question I have to ask.
-
@djabadu Yeah... that really doesn't match. It seems to be more focused on likes/dislikes, hobbies, toys, etc. But those things can apply to any human.
-
"While disorganized attachment is often associated with abuse, sometimes loving caregivers who have experienced trauma themselves can behave in confusing ways toward the child. This happens because of the caregiver’s own inability to control their emotions. Traumatized parents can have a difficult time managing their emotions and providing a sense of security for the child even though they are not abusive or neglectful. Anger or fear can erupt unexpectedly and traumatize the child. A loving caregiver can be experiencing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or dissociative identity disorder and unintentionally behave in frightening or confusing ways to their child."
I really hope that I can get some support for this before having children of my own. I don't want to confuse or scare them.
-
@djabadu Haha. I bet. It seems to be mostly their own way of making sense of themselves though.
-
"Researchers have found that disorganized attachment is associated with dissociative symptoms. Children in a relationship with an unpredictable or sometimes traumatizing parental caregiver have a difficult time establishing a consistent view of the parent and of themselves. The parent is both needed and to be avoided. The child may not understand what makes them a “good” child or a “bad” child, as the caregiver’s behavior is often confusing and unpredictable.
In order to maintain a relationship with the caregiver—and attempt to make sense of themselves—some children simply forget or deny the abuse. Jennifer Freyd refers to this as betrayal blindness. Forgetting or denying trauma is a symptom of dissociation. It is an adaptive and defensive strategy that enables the child to function within the relationship, but it often leads to the development of a fragmented sense of self."
Interesting. I wonder if this can be applied to the schooling environment too.
Sim Bot
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the 
